File: 1365118471512_1x1.jpg (1.1 KB, 1x1)
TAKEDOWN (3782) 17029
File: 1365122912410_chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-first-carrie-footage.jpg (22.82 KB, 300x300)
I totally love it!
Chloe is such an amazing actress ♥
Chlomoron (ba68) 17033
File: 1365129069330_crying.gif (1.98 MB, 259x221)
I called the phone number at the end and honestly thought it was her for a second
Lili Johnson !!eGMakPsOug 17036
File: 1365131882345.jpg (135.07 KB, 1280x720)
I for one am happy the shower scene is actually going to be in the movie. I cheered when I saw Chloë in the bloodied up towel (weird, I know) And my eyes lit up as the tampon hit Choë's face! October can't come soon enough!
File: 1365132422427_so-much-want.jpg (58.85 KB, 337x390)
This trailer exceeded any expectations I had. It looks intense. Those bullying scenes make me cringe with heartbreak. I can't wait.
Lili Johnson !!eGMakPsOug 17039
yes, me too.
makes me feel for her even more. I'll probably be on the verge of tears while seeing this scene fully played out in theaters.
This version of Carrie seems like it'll be much more emotionally convincing, and it'll have more depth. can't wait!
Edward Raffingfield (749f) 17040
File: 1365137453219_077.png (208.21 KB, 280x346)
Why was this delaaaaayed?!?!
This trailer was so well done. I can't wait for Chloë to fuck shit up at the prom.
mfw watching this
>>17042>This is for all the mainstream horror fans who like the "Twilight" and "Scream" franchises.
I hate both franchises yet this looks interesting
>Oh, and Chloë is completely wrong for the part. They could have easily picked someone else (and better).
She's not creepy enough but just because you're pretty doesn't mean you can't be bullied.
>Chloë can act but she's not made for this.
we'll see once the movie comes out
File: 1365150439299_haters.jpg (432.85 KB, 605x1222)
This has fucking NOTHING to do with twilight!
Calc !ukn9NKc/7Y 17045
File: 1365153238526.gif (2.44 MB, 327x360)
>>17043>She's not creepy enough but just because you're pretty doesn't mean you can't be bullied.
Agreed, but from the trailer I just don't really buy it at all.
One weird thing about the trailer that doesn't have anything to do with the quality of the movie itself is that it shows the whole damn thing, I mean what the hell, yeah most people has seen it before but that's a bit silly.
File: 1365166098561_ooo.jpg (25.66 KB, 332x369)
This is fucking Epic
File: 1365167819552_beiberfeiber.gif (6.95 MB, 450x253)
>my eyes lit up as the tampon hit Choë's face!
But yea, so glad the shower scene is in there.
I'm really excited for this. I'm not sure if I'm going to like it as much as the original. It's hard to say because Sissy pulled off Carrie so well. That said, this trailer has got me pumped.
Fawzi Bou Lawzi!F.UY7vg2RI 17053
File: 1365172997471_Fuck_Yeah_2.jpg (95.82 KB, 357x360)
Holy fucking shit, this is awesome. I've watched it over 10 times.
Anonymous (0083) 17054
she did pull it off well, but don't you think that this one will be even better at making you emotionally involved considering it's Chloë (someone we've all become…attached to, or have falling in love with) playing Carrie this time. I think she'll knock this one out the park, and will be just as good as Sissy was. ANd yeah Sissy had that impact at the end with her blinkless stare(that shit still haunts me), but in the new trailer I saw something in Chloë's eyes, (a reflection of the fire)
and all we saw was a snippets of the movie so there's still a possibility for some creepy C>>17041
forgot to put my name down Lili Johnson !!eGMakPsOug 17055
File: 1365176569112_vlcsnap-2013-01-11-12h42m10s63.png (112.92 KB, 284x305)
I hope the the reign of fire scene is in the movie too!
WoherWins (7d99) 17056
File: 1365177014261.jpg (490.61 KB, 1100x1100)
File: 1365179724461_humds.jpg (20.56 KB, 275x261)
didn't really like the trailer, looks like a 6/10 movie
File: 1365179770497_powerofyouthwow.jpg (939.63 KB, 2030x3000)
>don't you think that this one will be even better at making you emotionally involved considering it's Chloë
I'm not sure. I think it could go both ways. I could feel very attached because it's Chloe, or it could feel unrealistic because it's Chloe. I know how she is, and she has a very confident air to her.
>I think she'll knock this one out the park, and will be just as good as Sissy was.
I hope so. And I like hearing this considering you're reading the book.
>I saw something in Chloë's eyes, (a reflection of the fire)
Yea, she did look pretty fucked at the end. I hope there's some Creepy C. I would love that. To me, Carrie should be creepy, but then again, I'm basing this off of Sissy's amazing performance, having not read the book myself.
Either way, I'm super pumped to see this.
File: 1365179840517_spain2.jpg (734.55 KB, 2251x3000)
Yea, I got the same sort of impression
File: 1365179906212_Hick_80.jpg (135.4 KB, 1920x800)
dem popular kid clichés
File: 1365180778549_opinions_duh.jpg (95.42 KB, 321x361)
File: 1365183625454_omg_that_mouth.png (109.83 KB, 244x269)
I'm touched!!! OMG absolutely impressing trailer!
I can't wait!!! This movie will be EPIC!!!!
The intensity in her expression is… spechless…
Julianne Moore looks terrific too!!!
Lili Johnson !!eGMakPsOug 17070
File: 1365186643991.png (1.21 MB, 1348x648)
yea I noticed that too. and I was so happy when I saw it in the trailer!
File: 1365193047981_pink1.jpg (32.9 KB, 440x660)
so many people have a hard time understanding this simple concept
Anonymous (1155) 17076
sorry if my answer made you feel bad in any way for having asked a question, i just replied with what i thought on the matter>just answering
why do ask anyway?
WoherWins (a20e) 17077
File: 1365200147089_chloemhr069.jpg (744.97 KB, 2815x4023)
because i wonder :)
Anonymous (1155) 17078
File: 1365200382084.jpg (142.16 KB, 1280x720)
can't wait like the rest of us i suspect
Mastër Bëan!QMOd.BeanU 17079
File: 1365204268633.gif (603.95 KB, 420x350)
Anonymous (1d5b) 17080
Wow, you blokes really need to accept the fact that some - actually, a LOT - of people simply have grown tired of remakes and reimaginings. I don't care who was to be picked for this. It belongs in those two categories, and so it's a pass for me. I'd rather see something, uh, original. Relax, lighten the fuck up, and stop taking all of this so seriously.
This is being marketed for teenagers primarily, and yes, I lumped it in with the "Twilight" and "Scream" franchises because that is what it consists of: no-talent actors (aside from the exceptions like Chloe) who were/are only hired for their looks, lump in "hip" dialogue that is only spoken by people living in Beverly Hills - or in desolate countrysides, slap on a pop soundtrack, then try and pass it off as something everyone will want to see. Wrong.
It's my choice not to see it and to not support out of ideas Hollyweird, and that's that. It's got nothing to do with being some film snob. It's all about choosing movies that haven't been made thousands of times before.
This is but another piece of visual flatulence and will never be as good as the original. And don't give me the bit about it being another approach from the book. It was done once, done good, the first remake was shit, ditto the sequel, and now this. Same shit, different release date these days.
Anonymous (1155) 17081
File: 1365210954879.png (141.07 KB, 332x245)
yeah but this one has chloe in it
>>17080>. Relax, lighten the fuck up, and stop taking all of this so seriously.
To me this is funny as shit because the people who are uptight about this are those like you crying about remakes and the original
>This is being marketed for teenagers primarily, and yes, I lumped it in with the "Twilight" and "Scream" franchises because that is what it consists of: no-talent actors (aside from the exceptions like Chloë) who were/are only hired for their looks,
and juliane moore
the lead actresses are very talented (and so is the director) so it seems to me like they went for talented people, not "pretty ones"
>This is but another piece of visual flatulence and will never be as good as the original. And don't give me the bit about it being another approach from the book. It was done once, done good, the first remake was shit, ditto the sequel, and now this.
Again, you're the one doing the complaining. No one came to you and pulled your sleeve "heeeey, will you be seeing this? Will you? Huh? Will you? "
>Same shit, different release date these days.
I doubt the other ones had such talented people and production valiue behind them
so it's not the same shit at all
Anonymous (1d5b) 17083
> To me this is funny as shit because the people who are uptight about this are those like you crying about remakes and the original
Wrong, kid. It's called thinking for yourself instead of following in with the sheeple. I no longer put frustration into it. I simply point out the absurdity of these useless remakes which lose more and more money with each release.
> and juliane moore
the lead actresses are very talented (and so is the director) so it seems to me like they went for talented people, not "pretty ones"
Don't delude yourself; it's all about big names must equate big success, and we have seen that that's not the case before and in the times to come. If Hollyweird wasn't shallow, they would have picked an actress who is more convincing and right for the part, instead of a big name.
> Again, you're the one doing the complaining. No one came to you and pulled your sleeve "heeeey, will you be seeing this? Will you? Huh? Will you? "
I actually could give a fuck if you're going to see this or not. LOL Seriously, don't give yourself any credit into believing you're somehow significant in the outcome of a pre-packaged marketing device like the Hollyweird Machine. Go see it by all means. I on the other hand will be watching something worth my time and money that isn't geared toward tweens and teens - and anyyou fanboys on here.
> I doubt the other ones had such talented people and production valiue behind them
so it's not the same shit at all
Yeah, it IS the same shit, different release date. That's how marketing works, and you're obeying it all rather well. Do cease with assuming this and that about someone. Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups after all.
Drunkën Mastür!No.7//JDvE 17084
File: 1365215834263.gif (3.83 MB, 250x366)
>>17080>have not seen it>will not see it>it's definitely shit though>all remakes are shit>all originals are superior in every way
at least you went full retard like a baws
Drunkën Mastür!No.7//JDvE 17085
Uh oh we got an internet tough guy over here.
>and anyyou fanboys on here.
More name calling, such a bad ass.
Hmmm..if you're not a chloe fanboy then what are you doing on this site? I smell something…familiar.
Anonymous (1d5b) 17086
> at least you went full retard like a baws
Typical and predicable reaction from a cocksucker. Get back to your video games, son.
> Uh oh we got an internet tough guy over here.
No, actually it's a difference of opinion that you hate and anti-intellectualism IS your bag, However, I AM not the type to cross in person, and your comfort zone is the safety of anonymity. You know in person you wouldn't be able to be such an obnoxious little prick without having your head bashed in, and sent to the local ER with broken bones. Silly little fanboy who wants to shag Chloe is all you are, fucking loser shitbag with too much time on his hands - when he's not preoccupied wiping cum from it due to all those fap sessions given you can't get laid by any real woman. Kids today; no brains. just arrogance and stupidity worshiped like a god.
> More name calling, such a bad ass.
Hmmm..if you're not a chloe fanboy then what are you doing on this site? I smell something…familiar.
A badass is what I can be if need be however I don't resort to violence unless need be, and that hasn't been a necessity for years. ONLY ONLINE do I ever encounter mouthy little pricks such as yourself stuck in a dead end mediocre existence, wishing things were different, playing paper tiger. That's the only reason why you do it. In person people would laugh at you, mock, tell you to fuck off, and if you were stupid enough to make a physical mistake - and you DO seem like the type, you would only end up brutally beaten into submission, or worse, killed by someone who unlike me doesn't give a fuck about his or her own life, and wouldn't think of putting a bullet in your head.
Also, don't forget that MANY people have been tracked down and confronted or murdered online simply for words they posted. Yes, some people take it that far - and it very well could be YOU next.
Don't think for one moment that you're exempt. I wouldn't bother given I've a blessed fortunate life which I wouldn't want to be deprived of all on account of some listless genetic defective online who has a major possible obsession for a 16 year old girl who would never ever give him the time of day.
Drunken Mastur….you live up to that name, son. Just remember that all of this could have easily been avoided had your sperm donor shot his wad all over the whore of of cunt who is your mum.
Also, I'm sure Chloe is aware of this site and so it should be NO surprise that her brothers and friends keep a close eye on her. Then again, other actresses her age or older never have kith and kin around, and get by VERY well. Jodelle Ferland comes to mind.
Very level-headed young woman who has more talent than Chloe, and yet has no overbearing creepy older brother watching her every move. Then again, with creepy fucks like you, I don't blame him.
Spend a LOT less time fucking up online and more on being productive elsewhere. You never know; it might help…or not.
"When you look at the average American, you realize there's nothing nature enjoys more than a good joke." - George Carlin
Anonymous (1d5b) 17090
I did come to say what I had to about it like anyone else. If it bothers you then perhaps YOU should leave. I love how you trolls and shitstains think it;'s only your opinions and thoughts that matter. That's NOT the reality of things, especially out in the real world where no one would tolerate such arrogance and little man talk.
The movie will be shit, there's NO saving it from being bashed globally, and people have decided not to support redundancy. What are you going to do? Go and track down each and every post and comment about the movie that you don't agree with, and go on a virtual witch hunt? Yeah, good luck with that. LOL
Most - most - of what I observe on this site is blatant ass-kissing of Chloe, undersexed and lonely fanboys venting their fantasies which are better kept to themselves, and people speculating and wanting to know each and every detail of a 16 year old girl.
It's fucking pathetic! You're NEVER going to know her every desire, let alone know her. I've met her twice at conventions and she's what you would expect: down to earth, appreciative of her fans…and VERY guarded of her personal life, one thing many of you want every piece of, but will not get.
Fuck remakes; they're all shit and it's all about money from Hollyweird who make less and less which each attempt. Yet they have no learning curve - just like you and the others on here who fit the would-be stalker type.
Let it go and move on, kid.
File: 1365232962905_Cant_Tell_If_Troll_Or_Plain_Stupid.jpg (110.02 KB, 600x541)
> I love how you trolls and shitstains think it;'s only your opinions and thoughts that matter.
Everyone's opinions matters, except some of us have different opinions than the others.
>The movie will be shit
Have you even seen the movie? you are just judging it from the trailer.
>Most - most - of what I observe on this site is blatant ass-kissing of Chloe, undersexed and lonely fanboys venting their fantasies which are better kept to themselves, and people speculating and wanting to know each and every detail of a 16 year old girl.
Not all of us like that.
File: 1365234513479_Bitch_Please.jpg (134.12 KB, 515x485)
>>17094>What continues to make me laugh is how some people online - bigoted fucks especially - feel their own opinions matter more than others.>some people online
Some… you said it by yourself.
No, just 99.99% so far from what I've observed.
You must be blind.
File: 1365236049730_Lol_Why_U_Mad_Tho.jpg (96.23 KB, 500x509)
Clearly you are not here to discuss about the movie, you are here because your frustrated by some pervert anons.>It makes me even more grateful that these fruitcake fucks will never have the pleasure
And continuing to debate about how these perverts will never get her will not actually change and/or stop them.
You act like you're some kind of a savior or something. Bro, you can't force people to be or think the way you want, the world doesn't revolve around you.
If you want to continue your worthless talk you can go here >>120 , I'm pretty sure you'll have fun there.
>>17083>Wrong, kid. It's called thinking for yourself instead of following in with the sheeple. I no longer put frustration into it. I simply point out the absurdity of these useless remakes which lose more and more money with each release.
LOL. You're in no position to be condescending.
If they lost money they wouldn't keep making them and even if they to, that's entirely THEIR problem.
That 'thinking for yourtself part' works better when you can actually do the thinking
>Don't delude yourself; it's all about big names must equate big success, and we have seen that that's not the case before and in the times to come. If Hollyweird wasn't shallow, they would have picked an actress who is more convincing and right for the part, instead of a big name.
Neither Chloë nor juliane moore are such big names. They're not some A-listers who can put buts in the sit simply by having their name on the poster
Who is more convinving and right for the part? Juliane Moore IS right for the part and there were other actresses in the race before they settled on Chloë so it's not like they went with the pretty girl from the get-go. Their original choice was Shailene Woodley whcih apprently is a good actress (haven't seen her movies), is NOT a big name and she looks more plain / is less convetionally pretty.
So that argument of your is shit
>I actually could give a fuck if you're going to see this or not.
I never said anything about me. I was talking about you who came here whining as if someone was forcing him into seeing it
>LOL Seriously, don't give yourself any credit into believing you're somehow significant in the outcome of a pre-packaged marketing device like the Hollyweird Machine.
I don't thik you could spout more played out cliches if you tried. You forgot to tmention the jews btw
>Go see it by all means. I on the other hand will be watching something worth my time and money that isn't geared toward tweens and teens - and anyyou fanboys on here.
I don't need your approval to watch whatever I want to watch and I couldn't care less what you do
>Yeah, it IS the same shit, different release date. That's how marketing works, and you're obeying it all rather well. Do cease with assuming this and that about someone. >Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups after all.
I already pointed out why it is NOT the same shit, and it's not an assumption it's a god damn fact (such as the director and lead actresses being talented) which clealry flew over your head
File: 1365239050887_13157783404101.gif (1.59 MB, 317x250)
>>17090>The movie will be shit, there's NO saving it from being bashed globally, and people have decided not to support redundancy.
TEH POEPLE HAZ SPOKAN
Anonymous (f1f2) 17104
File: 1365241742012_folder.jpg (30.27 KB, 482x448)
Dunno if this has been already posted but here is the song from the trailer :
Lykke Li - Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow
File: 1365246846528_2013-03-10_002.jpg (32.54 KB, 612x612)
Does anyone else get an awkward feeling seeing Chloë in a new film?
Anonymous (6757) 17106
File: 1365247071835.jpg (57.22 KB, 363x279)
Depends on the film but yeah it happens
File: 1365247334866_hitgirl-x-large.jpg (134.26 KB, 489x368)
The feeling was strong with this trailer. Kick Ass 2 on the other hand…
File: 1365247511578_Chloe-Moretz-picture.jpg (1.3 MB, 2756x4134)
Do you think it's because we think we know Chloë on another level?
Anonymous (6757) 17109
File: 1365247745948.jpg (24.52 KB, 219x276)
IchiTheKiller !3XEZrAveNs 17110
File: 1365250741441_09.jpg (124.37 KB, 1024x483)
The Carrie trailer impresses me more and more each time I've seen it, which is only about 15 times.
I have a feeling I'm going to be watching this movie literally every single day when it comes out on Bluray just like I did with Let ME In.>>17094>>17096>>17099
Do you live in New York by any chance? Becuz, I think I know you.
IchiTheKiller !3XEZrAveNs 17111
File: 1365251007912_121.jpg (94.72 KB, 1024x379)
Yeah, I figured out how to play it on the geetar this morning. I hope they maybe put it in the movie. It sounds quite haunting and appropriate the way Lykke Li sings it with all that reverb.
Anonymous (80ef) 17115
You can go to /tv/ if you want to be overly negative with your opinions. If you want to criticize the trailer that's great, but saying hyperbole like 'it's just like Twilight'? Not the place for it.
Personally, some remakes are great. The American Dragon Tattoo greatly improves upon the old one. Let Me In, also wasn't bad.
Just as some people are tired of remakes, there are people who haven't seen every single movie in existence, or keep them in mind every single waking moment of their life such that they are unable to enjoy a re-adaptation. Keep that in mind.
Anonymous (1d5b) 17116
Look, it's not the fault of others that today's spoiled generation want everything remake/reimagined/re this/re that. Some classics will never be butchered all due to legalities as well as other elements such as the criminal sects of organized crime within Hollyweird who have actually prevented certain movies from such a fate.
They belong to us and they are part of our childhood memories, and it's not our fault that they were born a generation later with self-entitlement delusions, and detachment from reality via sites such as this - and many on here seriously need immediate psychiatric help with the level of obsession they show.
I posted the same opinions and facts on Facebook and no one got mouthy, and on the threads related to this movie, one cannot and will not be banned simply because others disagree with them. So, they can do that on here but that's it. They're as limited as their mentalities.
These mentally unstable fanboys assume way too much, and they think anything Chloe was/is in turns to gold. Well, wrong because out of all her movies so far, only a small handful were successful, both critically and financially. Even if this one is, it still doesn't matter.
There are more people against it than for it. So, these losers can play ban delusion on here all they like. Out in the real world that simply cannot be done. Toodles.
Oh, by the way, this site has been reported numerous times for its content and other things, and so do not be surprised if/when one day/night you come here only to find it gone. Hey, it has happened to plenty of other sites, and this one is NOT exempt from such a consequence.
P.S. to the trolls, badgers, and pricks alike: as I mentioned you cannot ban anyone on other sites, Facebook especially. So, enjoy your illusory sense of power on here, because it cannot happen elsewhere. Too bad. Oh, and next time I see Chloe herself at a local convention or out and about - because she does frequent this city (NYC) quite a bit!, I am going to mention this site, what is on it, she will more than likely object to it all along with her family - especially her mum Teri, and hopefully her disgust and contempt will result in it being shut down - and do not think it can't happen. I've seen countless sites disappear over time, and I won't be surprised if this one bites the dust as well.
>>17116>here are more people against it than for it. So, these losers can play ban delusion on here all they like. Out in the real world that simply cannot be done. Toodles.
Based on what? Twitter is a very good judge for this and more people seem excited for it than they don't
>Oh, by the way, this site has been reported numerous times for its content and other things, and so do not be surprised if/when one day/night you come here only to find it gone.
NO! NO! NOT THE CYBERPOLICE!!
File: 1365283221431_2.jpg (27.35 KB, 245x350)
to who? the cyber police?
did you backtrace is troll boy?
Anonymous (1d5b) 17120
@GG: Okay, one more since this is both laughable and absurd…
> Based on what? Twitter is a very good judge for this and more people seem excited for it than they don't
Based on this thing called word of mouth as well as what people say IN PERSON. I have not met one individual who is going to waste their time and money on this. Remake/reimaginings are becoming increasingly unpopular, something even full of shit Hollyweird is aware of - yet they insist on wasting even more money.
And just by mentioning Twitter you show ignorance. Are you aware of how highly faulty that thing is? I don't use it at all but I am aware that there's tons of spambots and fake profiles on it. Very unreliable and very much pathetic.
> NO! NO! NOT THE CYBERPOLICE!!
Who said anything about them, numbnuts? I'm talking about people who can and do shut sites down if they find reason to do so, and this site has about, oh, thousands of reasons for it. And I meant what I said about informing Chloe herself of this site the next time I either see her here out and about, or at a convention. Knowing how tight-knit, protective, and grounded her family is - especially her mum, this site stands a VERY high chance of being shut down at the behest of the entire Moretz clan.
@ThatGuy: trolls tend to accuse people who have something legitimate and relevant as being what they are, and that's nothing new. Keep obsessing over a girl who is waaay out of your league, and waste your time. That's all you trolls do.
Oh, and remember: trolling doesn't work in one's favor out in the real world. I can assure you of that. Try it and find out why you should keep your mouth shut to begin with.
Now, get back to your World of Warcraft, stale cheese puffs, room temperature beer, six-pack of Vaseline and spatula, have a go at Bobbi Sue the blow-up doll with the built-in vibrating vagina, then call it a night. Bye. :)
File: 1365284127289.jpg (12.62 KB, 206x242)
>>17120>Based on this thing called word of mouth as well as what people say IN PERSON. I have not met one individual who is going to waste their time and money on this.
I'm sure you made a survey on 100+ persons to have som representative data. Right?
>Remake/reimaginings are becoming increasingly unpopular, something even full of shit Hollyweird is aware of - yet they insist on wasting even more money.
if they weren't popular they wouldn't be making them
the new evil dead came out and it seems pretty successful
>I don't use it at all but I am aware that there's tons of spambots and fake profiles on it. >
So basically you don't have a clue what you're talking about. And I can distingusih the bots pretty easily
>Who said anything about them, numbnuts? I'm talking about people who can and do shut sites down if they find reason to do so, and this site has about, oh, thousands of reasons for it.
Who is that? The FBI?
WoherWins (d8d1) 17126
File: 1365285298809.jpg (1.06 MB, 3000x2304)
what's going on?
Anonymous (18f5) 17127
File: 1365285545510_trolling_hit_girl.jpg (247.85 KB, 618x503)
I'm expressing muh opinions
WoherWins (d8d1) 17128
File: 1365286569255_250.jpg (232.88 KB, 792x702)
you have come to the right place
File: 1365326920179_oh_yeaaaah5.jpg (19.69 KB, 342x357)
Troll has gone out already?
File: 1365327162541_1.jpg (324.95 KB, 1366x764)
Oh boy oh boy
IchiTheKiller !3XEZrAveNs 17131
File: 1365332138998_Clipboard013.jpg (87.42 KB, 1577x799)
We get it Mordensen, you think all remakes are shit. You should definitely tell that to Chloe when you see her at her next convention or when you randomly bump into her strolling around NYC. In the meantime, try spewing your ill gotten propaganda somewhere where they actually give a fuck becuz you're not changing anyone's opinion here.
I for one, am really excited to see this despite being wary at first about it being a "remake."
File: 1365335582541_124538160-actress-chloe-moretz-arrives-at-hick-gettyimages.jpg (80.27 KB, 395x594)
She nailed it in Hick, imo, so she can do it again
Anonymous (6757) 17134
File: 1365337933832.jpg (30.89 KB, 300x366)
Lolno she didn't
Apples and oranges
File: 1365353966981_126229176-actress-chloe-moretz-is-photographed-for-gettyimages.jpg (117.66 KB, 396x594)
I meant that she was convincing as an uncertain girl, who just swims with the current. So if she can do that, despite her real life persona, she can do what's required to be a convincing Carrie
Anonymous (1155) 17137
she was kind of portrayed as a victim in hick, albeit not for the entirety of the films runtime and not for long enough given what happened to her
plus as soon as carrie starts unleashing those powers she probably shouldn't be oozing 'victimised' anymore but rather we should start to see her gain some strength of character
we shall see
Drunkën Mastür!No.7//JDvE 17138
>>17132>>17136>Doubting Chloë's acting abilities
You'll never achieve top chlobro status
like that you filthy casual
I know she has a lot of range but I don't think she's mastered them all. There are two scenes in the trailer that rub me the wrong way
the bed levitating and the one at 00:35
And yes, I'll worry until I've seen the movies and all my worries would be confirmed or infirmed.
File: 1365360452124_hurrrr5.jpg (74 KB, 343x624)
So Jodi Foster is a better actress than Julianne Moore? And what the hell is this "Julianna replaced Jodi in Hannibal" wtf?
Drunkën Mastür!No.7//JDvE 17143
Well if you really need convincing that she can play a "broken down victim" you might be forgetting her performance in TKF, and albeit brief, I believe she really nailed it and was very convincing. As I'm sure you'll also remember, she also spent time in a women's shelter as part of her character research for that project. I personally don't need convincing in her abilities, but since you are having some doubt, then TKF is a good example that it is possible for her range to go there.
The bed levitating scene is more goofy because of the books being on strings. I'm not sure what's up with that, but it stands out as odd because of the much more polished effects in the other scenes. Trailers sometimes she things that never make it into the final cut, this could be one of those OR it could be still a work in progress and will be polished for the final cut. The take we saw may also not make it in, there's probably several takes with altering expressions from Chloe. The director will be paying attention to feedback on the trailer and either it won't make the cut or might be modified.
Anonymous (1155) 17145
i think her expression in the levitating bed scene is almost tantamount in naffness as her teen angst moment in tkf
i never even notic e the cgi or the books that much, just the expression on her face really stands out, whatever it is she's trying to portray
Anonymous (1155) 17147
it's almost as if she tried to cram too much mixed/coinciding.varying emotion into one moment and it ended up looking like nothing but badly feigned surprise
it's hard to say
File: 1365361112378_ChloFish1.jpg (87 KB, 820x432)
>>17145>tantamount in naffness
What big words. I can't even understand them>>17144
Thank ye. I confused Hannibal with Silence of the Lambs. My bad
Anonymous (1155) 17151
File: 1365361250650.gif (6.63 MB, 349x250)
>In case you're not getting what I'm saying
>this entire debate is rather pointless at this point (1st trailer, final movie 6 months away)
it's hardly a debate i'm merely voicing my concern on the matter and if you take issue with that i'll stop
yeah, that one is bad, no two ways about it>>17148
I really hope you're right and they'll use a different cut
Anonymous (1155) 17154
>>17153>My point is this is the "game on cocksuckers" debate all over again on here
i wasn't here for that so i wouldn't know
i'll keep my cocerns to myself in the future and just enjoy the trailer for what it is and enjoy the movie when that comes out
Just because it's a bad line / facial expression is not a guarantee it will be removed in the final version. Take a look at that horrible scene in TKF.
I would voice my concerns on kimberly perice's FB page but I can't comment for some reason.
I don't into FB
Anonymous (1155) 17158
File: 1365362734423_chloe_moretz_david_lavene_photoshoot_33.jpg (3.16 MB, 2756x4134)
i'm glad we've reached an understanding on the matter
the one in the police station ("what did I do?")
that stood out to some people (I've read a review that mentioned it, paddy did too, so did I)
I have plenty of confidence in her abilities. I know she can play strong, witty, charming, menacing, cunning, powerful, witty characters. But I don't know if she can play subtle, more introvert ones.
Here's what I also know (or am more than certain of): her level of self confidennce is through the roof. Ever since kick-ass and let me in her career skyrocketed. She has been in movies with world renowed directors, she has been on magazine covers and photoshoots, people tell her left and right just how beautiful and talented she is. How could that not give her a tremendous amount of confidence? And that is usually great, except that for this role she has to lose that and I don't know if she can. It's pretty much a part of who she is.
>>17163> I gave you an example of TKF as proof she can
where? I missed it
>you countered by complaining about a single scene that I wasn't even referring to when making that example.
I did what?
I just gave an example of a bad delivery that still made it in the movie, as proof that just because it's bad, doesn't mean we will get cut off and replaced by a different take
I thought you were talking about a scene in particular. I'll giver her scenes in TKF another look but I don't think any of them required her to be as emotionally vulnerable as carrie.
Like I said two scenes in the current trailer look pretty poor but maybe the new one will improve things, just like with kick-ass 2
Anonymous (1155) 17167
i actually really like the scene at 0:35 i feel it captures a complete innocence / pure benignity that if reflected in other scenes to could really elicite greater ammounts of sympathy from the audience
i think it almost appears like she's too simple, unassuming or benign to take a great deal of offense from what happened which could possible further hammer home that she really does not deserve to be treated as she is]but fuck it they'll probs just remove that moment too
>>17168>IF this is the case as you say it could be, She will never be an Oscar worthy actress.
Well there's this little thing called experience or getting better with time which I'm sure you're familar with so even though she might not be able to play a very vulnerable character now (and I'm not saying she can't, I'm just saying that to me, it's a possibility) she could be able to do so down the line>There's no 1 for 1 example, but there's enough evidence to prove it's possible if you are a skeptic.
I guess I should give LMI another watch too.
All I know is that I see what I see in the trailer and I really hope that's not representative for the full movie. I really look forward to a second trailer to shed some of the worries away
I know she can do the "loud" type of horrified (as evident in the locker room too)
I'm worried about the more subtle ones
Anonymous (1155) 17175
0:35 isn't the bed scene ( assuming you thought it was )
it's when she forgets to bring her fav poem to class or some shit
but what you say about surprise does kind of pertain to the 0:35 moment too
also i was thinking about what you said in regard of them putting a certain cut in the trailer to test the waters on it
why bother doing this at all if they do in fact have better takes of the scene, surely they wouldn't leave it in if they saw it as bad and had superior takes just because no one passed a remark on the trailer to confirm their thoughts on the scene
just put the best take in everytime surely, they have eyes and ears too
File: 1365368846875_hurrrrr6.jpg (68.48 KB, 450x614)
You guys should go to Never Ending Debate thread
Drunkën Mastür!No.7//JDvE 17177
I'm talking about the moments before and after the "flashback" that owen sees… look at her eyes LOOK and die inside ;_;
Watch her eyes as she visits her dying father at the hospital. When she first arrives and peers in the window and places her hands on the glass. Watch her eyes and they fill with tears and tell me that doesn't move you. Watch the moments before that when she visits the lobby of the hospital with concern for her "father" as she speaks with the nurse, watch her eyes. Observe her quiet broken look in TKF when she stands off in the corner as the police officer questions the girl in the orphanage. You want to see subtle moments like that, but you seem to overlook them. I can't get those moments out of my head, it's during all of those moments that Chloe has moved me so much. She has a magical ability to act through her eyes in a way that I have seen few are able to do.
Anonymous (1b4a) 17180
File: 1365369940199.jpg (790.47 KB, 3080x2053)
Those exact moments you described and a few others are what made me love Chloe. She plays so many different characters and does them all so well. Abby still has to be my favorite though.
it's no preconception
I see her not being that vulnerable / broken down in some of the scenes and I'm guessing it could be caused by what I said
I'll keep my worries until a new trailer will hopefully clear them
Drunkën Mastür!No.7//JDvE 17186
>>17185>I see her not being that vulnerable / broken down in some of the scenes
Sorry bro, but this is kinda like a duh moment here: They have said they are going back and bringing Carrie closer to the source material how many times? lots of times
Chloe is playing the 'book' Carrie, and I think you are spending too much time comparing what you saw to the 'Sissy' Carrie from the original movie which was a much more meager and weak version than in the book. The book Carrie starts becoming more confident as her abilities grow and she begins to enjoy her powers more and more in what could be described as rather sinister even.
I get what you're saying but
"I'll keep my worries until a new trailer will hopefully clear them"
And yes, I worry about this. She has two movies coming up and it will be make or break time for her to a certain extent.
She will be compared to spacek who got an oscar for her performance so she already has big shoes to fill. Not only that but she doesn't have that creepy factor or doesn't look weird or plain so she's starting with a handicap.
It's her first [major] leading role and if she doesn't shine in this then her career that has been constantly growing since kick-ass might not grow to the next level, like we were all hoping
Minner Burris (ea5e) 17192
First set aside the first film as a film. It was handsomely mounted in a film fan of Hitchcock sense, but disjointed, jumping in tone from 'Grease' to Tennessee Williams and then back to' West Side Story' and then to 'The Exorcism'. It was great fun but uneven. The Thing was Those 2 Women. Wow.
Then, there is a problem here. If you say "Don't compare the actresses as actresses" then you must compare Chloe to Carrie in the book.
If you compare Chloe as we have seen here as Carrie, she, for all her set-upon sadness, is physically really lovely. Carrie in the book was unlovely. Not ugly, but blotched and ungainly. Surprising her mom in the book was originally really pretty, but like a lot of sexually assaulted people, she had retreated into fat.
Chloë isn't being the Carrie of the book, she is, as is rightful, the Carrie of the film. This film.
But instead of saying "This Carrie is closer to the book" we should be really saying ""This Carrie focuses on the important battle of female wills with her mother"
This may be a chick movie in the best sense. It may have even more depth than the King novel in this sense. But that would be a challenge because the book was a compact marvel to getting both sides of everyone. But it won't be "closer to the book" in the depiction of the women as he saw them.
If that is the case, the good stuff would never make it to a trailer, it wouldn't be "oh wow" unless you were following the story. As they say… it remains to be seen.
>>17190>Yes, she will be compared to Sissy Spacek which is like comparing David Spade to Al Pacino.
Except no one ever said david spade is a good actor while she received a lot of praise for her performances
>I know you don't like that I've said so just because you don't like other people's opinions, however, this is coming from a sincere point of view. No trolling; there's already enough of those on here and I'm not part of that ratio.
you've done nothing but troll the entire thread so it's absolutely hilarious that's you're trying to come across as "sincere"
File: 1365615041580_3.jpg (61.88 KB, 480x270)
Drunkën Mastür!No.7//JDvE 17196
File: 1365639230358_vlcsnap-2013-04-10-20h04m22s151.png (1.49 MB, 1920x816)
For those that want the best quality available..
Apple Trailers 1080p Carrie Trailer
- Higher quality than yahoo trailer I shared earlier
- No 'Yahoo! Trailers' watermark! or any watermarkshttps://mega.co.nz/#!EU0iGaRJ!HzOtFHvFAxY05FgJD2YDNFdG6GBihN72bdD0-TY6Ay4
Anonymous (0577) 17201
I consider circulation of images and the subsequent 'humorous' remarks made toward her forms of bullying. I'm using the term aptly.
Why even bring up 'traditional bullying' whatever that's supposed to be? The world is different and as such human interaction changes as well.
I can't really stand people that shift blame like this, especially when the crux of the argument is that the bullying wasn't 'old style' like you remember back in the day.
Anonymous (1b4a) 17204
File: 1366048574728.jpg (181.92 KB, 500x680)
I know what you mean. Trying to talk about Carrie and then people like this guy >>17201
HouseEunuch (fcf1) 17205
Bullying does not necessarily have to be physical in nature; most often the goal is to taunt, embarrass and humiliate the victim, which is exactly what was intended by spreading those images via social media. In several recent cases - Audrie Pott and Rehtaeh Parsons to name two - the humiliation of having the images of their rapes uploaded to social media by the animals who assaulted them was compounded by then having girls join in by mocking them, accusing them of being sluts, and laughing at their pain and suffering. The definition of bullying has been broadened since social media has made it more pervasive, insidious, and widespread than ever. In the past once you got home from school you were safe from your tormentors, at least for the evenings and weekends; now with Facebook, twitter, etc. the abuse and cruelty can continue nonstop 24/7 - their is no escape or safe, neutral ground.
And as these poor girls clearlyshow the notion that only ugly girls are bullied is counterintuitive and absurd; teenage girls will not target a fellow classmate DESPITE the fact that she is pretty - they will specifically target her BECAUSE she is pretty, and hence competition that thing that teenage girls think about only once, and that is continuously….boys. A girl who is a socially awkward loner and unattractive need not fear the wrath of the ''tribe" beyond the occasional taunt because she is not regarded as competition for the available males and hence not a threat - her punishment is simply to be ostracized from the "in crowd" and left to function on the outskirts of the social scene as a barely noticed outcast. But Chloe Grace's Carrie is something quite different - the perfect storm to drive the other girls into a frenzy; an outsider with no allegiance to the group dynamic and social order who is so beautiful that even the plainest of clothes and no makeup cannot detract from her - in fact her shy awkwardness and unique appearance would likely draw the boys to her, especially when compared to the cabal of snooty, narcissistic "fashionistas" who rule the roost. The idea that girls will viciously target a classmate for being fat or having acne is a quaint fanciful notion; the kind of hate Carrie engenders is because her beauty and offbeat charm is potential competition. I know if I was sitting in class with a group of insufferable bitches and suddenly saw an awkward, meek Chloe Grace look up at me, bless me with a warm gentle smile, and then look shyly away - I would be absolutely smitten. This potential scenario is why the other girls would target, abuse and bully her, and if you don't believe it take the time to check out the news - girl on girl bullying is an epidemic with a tragic list of victims that grows by the week. If there was ever a film remake that was timely and spoke to current worries and concerns then Carrie is that movie; with its themes of bullying (especially girl on girl), religious fundamentalism run amok, and teens spewing out violent retribution to their school ground tormentors this story is, sadly, far more relevant today than it was in the 70es, speaking directly to this generations worst fears and shared weaknesses…..can't wait for October.
Anonymous (0577) 17208
All of this.
I think you're using "bullied," too broadly. She wasn't "bullied," at all in any traditional sense, just in the "We're concerned mothers and we're going to call any bad thing that happens bullying because it's a term we can rally behind," sense. She killed herself out of embarrassment and frustration. It's not even an applicable example.
I already wrote what I felt.
The point is that there isn't some kind of easy category for who gets bullied. And there are plenty of real life examples with much diversity. That's it.
Anonymous (1b4a) 17209
A reasonable response is retarded? What's with the name calling at people trying to talk with you?
Anonymous (0577) 17210
Your response consisted of :
>"That's not traditional bullying!"
>"She just couldn't handle it! Her fault for being assaulted, then being mad about it."
You don't even bother responding in an intelligent way and instead try to twist the meaning of the key word here.
Obviously the bullying in the article is in the form of harassment to the point of emotional distress. If I traced your IP, got your facebook, then proceeded to get loads of people to harass you, then yeah that would be more closely related to the bullying in the article. I can't believe I have to spell out the difference.
Again, confirming the point. Expecting something like "why so mad" very soon. Don't bother.
Anonymous (1b4a) 17211
It seems like you're just arguing for the sake of arguing here. Pictures circulate because that's the nature of scandalous pictures. It isn't necessary for any bullying to be involved. And never said it was her fault either, I'm not sure what you're trying to do here. Your hostility is really confusing.
The story is that she was sexually assaulted then pictures of the assault got around. She killed herself because she was embarrassed and frustrated that nothing was being done. The entire school knew about it and she said herself she felt her life was ruined. So she committed suicide.
All irrelevant anyway since the point was there is no connection between the article posted and what happens with Carrie. It's a Carrie thread, remember?