[top] [bottom]
You are now browsing the old version of Chlomo, an archive of the old site. Click here when you want to go the new version.
[ chloe ] [ photoshoots / photo sets / movies ] [ offtopic ] [ site ]

/misc/ - old miscellaneous threads

Welcome to chlomo.org, the best Chloe Grace Moretz fan site™. We have all the Chloe news, pictures,
photoshoots, videos, fan art, original content, GIFs and discussions you could ever want.
If you're new, read this or give your honest thoughts on this place
posting Chloe fakes, disrespectful comments about her or her family will get you banned
if you want the latest Chloe updates (news, photoshoots and so on) you can find them here
report bugs, posting problems or feature requests here or contact support@chlomo.org
back to index

If you are new here DO NOT make a new thread (read why)
Name
Subject
Comment
Image
max. 10Mb / 10000px
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Flags
01download the chlomo pack02see the image gallery03join #chloe4starwars04are you new here?

File: 1338416935276.jpg (40.09 KB, 450x337)

 Forced anon (e690) 2871

I was pondering the idea of using the forced anon option to hopefully make the threads more about chloe and less about namefagging (there's a board for that). I'm curious to what you guys have to say about it. Bare in mind this is simply a hypothetical question.

And before someone goes "oh noez admin is doing this because he hates namefags know that my partner in crime is ok with this idea - or at least discussing it - and he was as big as they come when it comes to namefag).

So, let us hear your thoughts about it.

 thedante!s4jsf1HzKo 2872

i really don't know now

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2873

Does this mean namefags cant have names in a thread?

 Anonymous (753b) 2874


 Mr. Bean!!9bINe43AAo 2875

File: 1338417586959.png (107.44 KB, 361x360)

Nice timing, posting this.
FORCED_ANON: Do not want. Anon's making a mountain out of a mole hill, if you don't like namefags then fine but don't keep shitposting about your hatred of us. You don't see us starting that shit. Unless it's Fro or Cheddar trying to be funny (>mfw).

 Anonymous (753b) 2876

>>2875

> t don't keep shitposting about your hatred of us


And here comes the tired drama. What hatred? It was a simple question which you could have answered without the stupid speculation

 Solar!!7jvwXbIqxQ 2877

File: 1338417778820.jpg (14.99 KB, 131x151)

I don't really care either way.

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2878

File: 1338417805436.jpg (88.34 KB, 346x398)

>>2874
Well then I am entirely ok with this but honestly it seems fine the way it is but most defineitely more chloe talk is always good although the flip side would probably mean threads move considerably slower considering ime 35%+ posts pertain to namefag banter(not necessarily a bad thing).
I figure its worth considering allright.
Its a tough call, good luck making it.

 Mr. Bean!!9bINe43AAo 2879

File: 1338418021216.png (47.78 KB, 640x363)

>>2876
I could have, but I didn't.
>What hatred?
Well, hatred is going a bit far, but Anon has to constantly comment about namefags having some sort of USI or that we all think Anon has no opinion. This is not true with every fucking namefag.

 Anonymous (753b) 2880

>>2878

> ean threads move considerably slower considering ime 35%+ posts pertain to namefag bante


but this is the chloe board

namefagging could still be done in bros and threads speed is not a reason in itself. Otheriwse we could make this a general board and discuss absolutely everything and threads would move way faster but as long as it;s not chloe related what's the point? This is not a sprint, it's a marathon.

 Cheddar!!woFEDRhtcg 2881

Everything is fine the way it is. Not really any real need for a change.

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2882

File: 1338418203803.gif (997.52 KB, 126x94)

Altenately you could force everybody who posts to select a name, kind of similar really although it wouldnt eliminate the namefag banter, if anything it would just intensify it.

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2883

>>2880
Im willing to stake namefag banter is half the allure of coming here for certain parties, a drop in the visitation rate from these people could slow posting even more as a result but yes marathon not sprint et al.
JJust look at the people who claim this place is getting slower by the day, hopefully the marathon mentality can be embeded within their idea of this place and forced anon might help that.

 !CalcLbWSVA 2884

File: 1338418377319.jpg (92.52 KB, 500x750)

Won't care too much, although I don't really think the namefagging banter is that bad. Would very much like being able to namefag in bros though.

 Anonymous (753b) 2885

>>2879

Well, more people have complained about these threads sometimes feeling like a bunch of circle jerking and I can't say I always disagreed with that. Having these threads more on topic could be good (we are in the chloe board after all).

 Mr. Bean!!9bINe43AAo 2886

>>2885
Agreed.

I take back >>2875, do whatever, Admin Overlord.

 Anonymous (753b) 2887

>>2883

> Im willing to stake namefag banter is half the allure of coming here for certain parties


well with all due respect fuck those certain parties, this is a chloe board of a chloe chan after all after all, if they're not here for chloe they're here for the wrong reason


> ust look at the people who claim this place is getting slower by the day, hopefully the marathon mentality can be embeded within their idea of this place and forced anon might help that.


claiming is one thing and knowing is the other. The traffic is as high as it was before (slightly higher even)

>>2884

yeah, namefagging would still be allowed in bros

  2888

File: 1338418784638.jpg (104.66 KB, 873x1024)

The only problem that people seem to have with namefags is during # threads, the specific threads remain very much on topic. Since the # threads are styled to what they used to be on /b/ I don't really see a problem, but then again ; I'm a namefag.

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2889

Just out of curiosity was namefag banter ever an issue on the dead chan back when it weren't so dead.
>inb4 everything on that chan was an issue or something to that effect

 Anonymous (753b) 2890

>>2888

but you're assuming people didn't have a problem with then back there either.

But this is simply a hypothetical discussion. We're just discussing how people would feel about it.

>>2889

Why not give /b as an example? The old chan had namefaging but like I said that not exactly relevant. /b doesn't have it anymore but who's to say that's a good thing?

That's what we're discussing here.

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2891

Some of the perpetual lurkers that recieve hate sometimes might be more inclined to post if there were no names and by extension no inside name based conversations but rather just predominantely chloe related thangs, no? Can ant lurkers chip in to substantiate this claim?

 Anonymous (753b) 2892

>>2891

That's one of the things we had in mind with this, yes.

  2893

File: 1338419893040.jpg (63.86 KB, 904x1200)

>>2890

>but you're assuming people didn't have a problem with then back there either.


Fair enough I guess…It's just how things were done back then, I don't see why we need a change.

If people want 100% Chloe then they can go to the specific Chloe threads, general chloe threads are well…random. Without the 'criclejerk' or whatever they would be essentially nothing and then I could see this chan becoming like the old, where everything was very systematic rather than the 'sense of freedom' it has now.

All that would happen if forced anon occured would be that the # threads would move to /bros/?

Maybe that's what people want but wouldn't it also exchange the speed of the boards prehaps..

I had something else say but forgot…so yeah……

 Anonymous (753b) 2894

>>2893

> Fair enough I guess…It's just how things were done back then, I don't see why we need a change.


No one said we need to change. It's just a possibility that's being taken into account.

Sometimes people want to talk random chloe stuff which us why general threads are good for. We had a general discussion threads but that was burried when this model got started. You would also still be able to talk random chit chat but it would be as an anon and hopefully that would avoid some of the circle jerking that some users complained about

And like I said speed is not such a huge deal. It doesn't say anywhere that there must be X posts per hour

  2895

File: 1338420502271.jpg (1.32 MB, 2000x3000)

>>2894

>talk random chit chat but it would be as an anon and hopefully that would avoid some of the circle jerking


>Random chit chat

>Without identifying each other

You've lost me there pal.

>And like I said speed is not such a huge deal. It doesn't say anywhere that there must be X posts per hour


Again, fair enough. But surely it is better, no?

 Anonymous (f4f3) 2896

File: 1338422074462.png (722.73 KB, 799x581)

I agree that forced anon can attract some anon lurkers to post, that would increase the speed, besides, namefags can still be easily indentified like on /b/, i think it's worth a shot, to at least see if we could get some people in that only lurk and are tired of namefags chatting, if it won't work we can stop it anytime, but im all up for at least trying it, namefags can move to /bros if theyll hate the idea, its whats there for anyway

 Anonymous (9d7d) 2897

all the threads will be about trying to identify namefags…

scrap this idea

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2898

>>2897
Initially yes but if the idea is maintained for long enough they shoul fall in line.
Ive thought about it some more and I honestly think that an implementation of forced anon would ultimately have a negative effect on the fun feel of this place but yes I would like to see more lurkers posting.
Is it a possibility that maybe you can like select an option if you so please to block all posters names and or certain posters posts just on your screen, it might be overtly complicated but that way you could see what you want posted by whome you want.

 Narwhal !FisPY5nvaE 2899

File: 1338424182424.jpg (26.23 KB, 395x396)

wut

 Anonymous (4c8a) 2900

File: 1338426481713.jpg (108.95 KB, 600x708)

Count my vote for trying this idea. I don't hate all the namefags, in fact I rather enjoy many of them, but there are two in particular that no matter how hard I try, anytime I see their name I just cringe immediately. The post itself may not even be bad, but from history of their shit posts I can't overlook it since they have proudly displayed their asses on several occasions. Therefore forced anon would be less stressful I think for everyone. Give it a go for a week or two and see what happens. It certainly can't hurt to try.

 Anonymous (afe8) 2901

File: 1338435134222.jpg (125.14 KB, 357x346)

sure, it would make threads more about chloe . . . on the other hand maybe if some namefags stop being bitches then people wouldn't really care.

 Anonymous (ffe3) 2902

I don't care much either, but I do lean mostly towards all being anon or all being named.

But it is not a big deal if things stay the same. I don't mind the namefagging going on. Sometimes it is actually fun to read people bandying over a name.

 Anonymous (e481) 2903

File: 1338461819979.jpg (220.44 KB, 1274x945)

>>32666
No, we wouldn't.

  2904

File: 1338462591224.jpeg (9.51 KB, 380x258)

>>2900

>Did someone say Fro?

 Anonymous (550f) 2905

I actually had something meaningful to say. I tried to post 2 times. Both times I encountered critical device errors which prevented me from doing so. It must be an omen and my efforts would likely be futile anyway.

Maybe rather than forcing anon and upsetting your core demographic of attention whoring adolescent name fags that don't even like chloe other than as fap material, maybe just create a new board or the vamp the current ones. It's become impossible to find chloe talk in /chloe/ board on a chloe chan. You need to find a balance between maintaining site integrity (which at this point there is none) and keeping your core demographic happy and not scaring them off.

 Anonymous (550f) 2906

Problem: /Chloe/ is no longer even remotely about Chloe.
We need to come up with potential solution to this supposedly problems with minimal consequences. What is forcing a non have less consequences then more aggressive moderation? Or perhaps revamping the current boards or even potentially creating new boards? Etc. Again what's the best solution with the least amount of consequence and blowback?

But hey I'm just won a non who mostly lurks occasionally post never post pictures and has resorted 2 cheats trolling to get my fix around here because I can't find any chloe talk. So what the hell would I know about not pissing people off when that's clearly all I'm good for

 Anonymous (f2a7) 2907

>>2906

>Problem: /Chloe/ is no longer even remotely about Chloe.

> I can't find any chloe talk
what? nigga, you serious?

 Anonymous (550f) 2908

>>2907
Maybe you should be more clear in your intentions for creating this thread/ sticky. What exactly is the problem then? And the purpose of this thread / sticky? Why consider forcing anonymous posting if there is nothing wrong? So something is wrong then? What is wrong? What is the problem? Once we identify the problem we can isolate it and work out potential solutions with the least consequence.

In my opinion it seems that the cord demographic of this site is perfectly happy and pleased with things the way they are and you really don't want to upset that core demographic regardless of what you want one meaningless anonymous lurker/troll has to say or thinks

 Anonymous (550f) 2909

Just please, whatever you do DON'T FORCE ANON.

This is just a bad idea for several reasons. An obvious reason is that those posters here for attention will no longer be able to get their fix. Reputation, etc. In short, even if they wont admit it outright, the name friends will NOT like this. Why else would they be so fixed on their identities within the bounds if this microcosm anyway? Clearly the focus isn't Chloe.

On a personal level:
Well, browsing through the pages of this board 1 thing becomes exceedingly clear, almost all of the worthwhile posts and noteworthy content has been contributed by anonymous posters. Example: the epic articles and interview thread, one of best reasons for a non chantard to visit this board! So, by forcing anon you will be making it much more difficult (for me) to quickly be able to sift through what's going to most likely be a worthwhile post or garbage.

My only request is that there needs to board for people like me who want all that awesome Chloe content without the static and noise (essentially spam) that is the 'number threads.' That would be really awesome if my self and others could just come to a board (preferably this board, /chloe/ a)nd be able to find all but content we want quickly and easily without having to sift through what is essentially (to me and people like me who are here as fans of Chloe and nothing more) spam. Some people have no intention of getting mixed up with the whole 'numbers threads' scene. Seems like that stuff needs its own space rather than forcing those same people to post anonymously which is only going to be problematic.

 Solar!!7jvwXbIqxQ 2910

Could give it a try at least I suppose?

I honestly don't care about using a trip or not, I've just become used to doing it here now, I'd happily post as anon.

I definitely agree the # threads aren't really that great most of the time though, especially when the topic of conversation veers WAAAAY from Chloe or breaks down into some "Is she/Isn't she dating" crap.

 Anonymous (753b) 2911

File: 1338498689516.jpg (52.46 KB, 328x360)

>>2906
>>2908
>>2909
>>32890

The idea behind this is that it might reduce the namefagging and maybe bring in some lurkers (it's a shame since they are so many, especially US fags, but for some reason that eludes me they refuse to post - even casually / on rare occassions).

Why should we make a new board? Things are about as simple as they come - chloe and bros for things that ARE and ARE NOT chloe related. It's about as straight forward as things get.

The numbered threads will stay. They are just like the threads on b. Initially we had a thread for general discussion but these are better since they offer a change (of pace, theme and so on). Just like the chloe threads on b they are bound to be taken off topic from time to time. That is natural and compeltely acceptable as long as they don't get out of line (and yes, that is obviously a gray area).

I dont want moderation to be more strict. I'm not dealing with kids (or at least I hope I'm not) so I won't treat them as such. I don't need to give them a slap on the wrist everytime a conversation might get oo much off topic. They should figure that out for themselves or the others should let them know

"hey, your football talk is taking for too long, might taking that to the divegrass thread?"
or
"these offtopic talk are going on for way too long, get back to chloe or get back to bros"

If there will be people here who seem to ignore that then I will take more strict measures but for the most part we should be able to understand each other like normal fucking human beings and more importanly like chlobros.

That chain mention on the front page remains and I couldn't give a flyng fuck about what others might think about it. /b/ gave birth to this place and those chain were a huge part of the chloe phenomenon.

I hate it when chloe threads turn into a bunch of circle jerking. But there's something else I hate even more and that's bitching. There's such a thing as constructive criticism and then there's bitching. And you have done nothing but bitch left and right constantly. Even taking into account that you were trolling for the most part there's still a considerable amount of bitching alongside it.

You say there's not enough chloe discussion but when was the last time you started a topic or at least a conversation? Even with all the namefagging here those guys still post chloe which is more than you do (which is NOT posting chloe).

I also find it funny how you keep reiterating that you're just a poor lil ol' anon / lurker / troll since i know you are (or used to be) a namefag and you should have been more than aware of that so the only effect that those parts of your post had is making me go "is he fucking kidding me?"

> An obvious reason is that those posters here for attention will no longer be able to get their fix. Reputation, et


This is not a place for some people to get their attention whoring fix, no matter what some might think.


I also see a lot of complain about the who is she dating thing. Some might care, some might not. I have no problem with it but some do. I will make a separate threads for it where all the gossip / dating specualtion and discussions can go. Obviously it will stay in /chloe since it's chloe related but it will remain contained in a single thread and not spread to other discussions.

To sum it up and make everything perfectly clear: all that circle jerking and the taking of discussions too offtopic in /chloe/ are somewhat of a problem but it's not big to require strict moderation. I'm still hoping the guys here can understand each other (since we're not fucking animals) but if things will deteriorate then a more strict moderation will be required (and the only thing that will do is ask people to take their shit to bros so it's not like anything will be lost. interdicted or anyone would be 'oppressed').

But more importanly I'm hoping this might attract some lurkers. I never understood lurking if you are a user who vitits this place on a pretty regular basis. You like chloe … that's why you're probably here. How can you not want to be involved in any of the discussions (no matter if it's regarding her movies, her looks, perdonality etc)? I'm hoping that the anonimity might make everyone look and feel equal so if someone new was to join he wouldn't feel like an outsider (it's not like we were anything but polite to all the newcomers but like I said - their mentality is something I can't comprehend).

This will probably end up being tested for a week. It might turn out to be a good idea or it might turn out to be the stupidest plan ever. We'll just have to see and the final decision will be based on how the people here would have felt about it at the end of that one week.

 Anonymous (e481) 2912

File: 1338500895772.jpg (60.86 KB, 448x649)

>>2911
I agree with every single argument of yours and believe your decisions will be beneficial and more then right for us, oh our beloved mister Overlord !
All Hail !

 Anonymous (a57d) 2913

File: 1338502036663.jpg (10.81 KB, 377x534)

>>2911
>/b/ gave birth to this place and those chain were a huge part of the chloe phenomenon.

nice watch.
There were times when it wasn't even about chloe anymore. Times when we used /b/ and chlomo as a social network to come and talk to our friends (namefags). and now you want to dispose of that.

>it will never be like the old days.


Danger(RIP), Boxxyfriend(RIP), CM, Home®, Liam, Cory, Chlobro, Chloegracedevotee,
Echo, Babbly, SubjectComment, ;Prodigy, Mayobro, Perth, Fabooster, DatChloë, Chloejetzt,
Chloëholic, Fartfag, HitBoy,
ChloFro, Kirby, Anonymous420gr, Kan, Chloschmo, Kal, Chlo fo' sho',
Nemo,cubia, Dr.NoQuints, Mr. Bean, Komodo, thedante, KamikazeKow,
chloeform, Pillowman and anonymous

Philly, PA
Albuquerque
Chicago
Australia
Cashville
Polish
Germany
Mexico
Denamark
Norway
Brazil
Colombia
Chile

nice watch

 Anonymous (550f) 2914

>>2911

You ask for criticism but then when you get the cold truth you don't want it. Ok. What was the purpose of this thread/sticky anyway? Just to tell everyone "hey were going forced anon to try it out and see what happens…?" "because thia might bring some lurkers out of the shadows..?"
I don't think so, but I wont get into any "bitchy" reasons why that is.
> i know you are (or used to be) a namefag
Elaborate. Not sure what you mean as I have never used a name or tripcode.

In the end all forcing anon will accomplish is tarnishing the "image" of the anonymous posters here whom happen to make almost all of the worthwhile posts. Its not going to bring the lurkers out or change the posting habits of your core namefag attention whoring adolescent demographic.

 Anonymous (753b) 2915

>>2913

> There were times when it wasn't even about chloe anymore. Times when we used /b/ and chlomo as a social network to come and talk to our friends (namefags). and now you want to dispose of that.



Nooo, I want to move that to bros when it gets out of hand and keep chloe more focused on

wait, what was it about?

of yeah

CHLOE

> >it will never be like the old days.


And who's fault is that? Sorry to burst your bubble bro but some of the biggest namefags are here but

a) they have become anons and

b) they're the ones supporting this

Do you see the epic irony here?


And this thing might not become permanent, it might even turn out to be a disaster. The decision will be based on how you and the other people here feel about it it.

I don't want to remove our deny anything. I just want to keep the chloe board more chloe centric because … and this may come as a shock to you … a lot of us were there for chloe, not to be a part of some social network, not to find out who and what had for breakfast. That sort of chit-chat "look gurl I did mah nailz today" is one of the main reasons anons hated namefags anyway. Don't get me wrong that is absolutely normal (as is socializing in such a context) but for many people it was always about chloe first and foremost.

It's all in the name: chlobros
1. chloe 2. bros

 Anonymous (a57d) 2916

File: 1338503158887.jpg (13.83 KB, 819x489)

>>2914
this. Im done chiles. you already had your mind made up before you made this fucking thread in the first place.

 Anonymous (550f) 2917

>those guys still repost the same old pictures of Chloe tirelessly which is more than you do.

Fix'd

 Anonymous (753b) 2918

>>2914

> You ask for criticism but then when you get the cold truth you don't want it. Ok. What was the purpose of this thread/sticky anyway? Just to tell everyone "hey were going forced anon to try it out and see what happens…?" "because thia might bring some lurkers out of the shadows..?"



What have you been smoking? What truth I don't want? I already explained the purpose of the thread. I'm not going to repeat it

> I don't think so, but I wont get into any "bitchy" reasons why that is.

Please do. You have every right to complain just like every user here and this is a thread for bitching.


BUT

that doesn't mean you can't actually contribute with anything in the other threads, You know, actual conversation and not just bitching / trolling.

> Elaborate. Not sure what you mean as I have never used a name or tripcode.

I'm not the one to play kiddie games and this story of yours is so cheap I wouldn't buy it if it were free. I'm 99% sure you're the namefag I think you are and I'll leave it at that

> In the end all forcing anon will accomplish is tarnishing the "image" of the anonymous posters here whom happen to make almost all of the worthwhile posts. Its not going to bring the lurkers out or change the posting habits of your core namefag attention whoring adolescent demographic.


Yes, they have. Except you who have done nothing but bitch and troll. Is it so hard to be part of a normal chloe discussion without bringing your vitriol?

And like I said this might be a horrible idea. We will try it, see how it works and in the end if it turns out to be a bad idea it will be ditched.

 Anonymous (753b) 2919

>>2917

but you post almost none (maybe even zero) and they can actually take part in chloe conversations while you rarely do.


>>2916
> Im done chiles. you already had your mind made up before you made this fucking thread in the first place.

That is dead wrong. If it wanted it done it would have been already in effect with no discussion about it. This is just an idea. Echo agreed with it too so it's not like it was only my call. Some people here seem to support it too so it's not like I'm deciding what's best for others.

I also don't see you problem. I really don't. We can still have namefagging in bros. You can make general chit chat threads and post chloe pics while you do. It will be namefagging heaven. What more can I do for you?


I could also take your namefagging list and tear it apart:


echo, subjectcomment and pillowman were the same guy - and he's here

danger used to come here but now has forsaken us - yet he still posts chloe 24/7 on FB - I can't force him to come, can I?

boxxyfriend is also welcomed here (although he would do us all a favor if he would drop the boxxy part - he's a 100% reformed chlobro according to his ow words- what's wrong with chloefriend?

chloeholic still comes here but he barely posts - it's not like he's not welcomed here (all I ask from him is that he speaks english - so that we can actually understand him and not feel like we're in the middle of a mexican skype conversation)

liam, hitboy and fartfag were MIA for a long time

chloejetz barely found the site a few days ago if I remember correctly

dante is here, chlobro is here, cubia is here and so are a few other well known namefags who went under the radar

There's absolutely nothing stopping any of those from coming here. There's nothing stopping them for posting chloe here or if they want a good old fashioned namefag meetup you can go to bros. I'll make a sticky there with a pretty picture and you can talk until the end of time about all you desire.

Seriously, what more do you want me to do? All I want is to keep the /chloe/ part of the chan more chloe centric as some people requested, rightfully so in my view.

  2920

>>2919

>Circlejerk general?

 Anonymous (753b) 2921

>>2920

Yes, we can have a circle jerk general in /bros.

 Anonymous (753b) 2922

File: 1338505137768.jpg (20.25 KB, 209x271)

>>2921

and you can be the general in charge of circle jerking

  2923

>>2921

Better have that name..

>Idon'thavethegifbutwhenchloeissadthenhappyintheschoolgirloutfitinkickass


Wouldn't most of the traffic (if that's the right word) just go to bros then? and then /Chloe/ will be for dumping sets only (like /image/ on the old chan?

  2924

File: 1338505344932.jpg (851.08 KB, 1745x3000)

>>2922

Shotgun.

 Anonymous (753b) 2925

File: 1338505363040.jpg (222.19 KB, 1920x1080)

>>2923

> Wouldn't most of the traffic (if that's the right word) just go to bros then?


What makes you think most people are here for the circle jerking instead of chloe?

  2926

>>2925

Or more of the posters / speed. Since the poeple who post most seem to be namefags, and they seem to post in the '#' or 'circlejerk' threads. Just what I'm guessing, I could be wrong.

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2927

File: 1338505600348.jpg (74.48 KB, 612x612)

>>2925
I'm here to talk Chloe with chlobros. If there was no Chloe, I wouldn't be here but if there was no identifiable chlobros, I wouldn't be here either. I'm here for both together.

 Anonymous (753b) 2928

>>2926

Maybe that's true maybe that's not, it's irrelevant. The point is simple: chloe here. circle jerking in bros. And that's not to mean that you can just move the chloe threads to bro. You can have tour threads there about everything you desire (and even post chloe pics while doing so if you want) but if the conversation turns into something chloe related it should be continued here (since it concerns people in the chloe board) just like offtopic discussions that go on for too long should be taken there.

It's a very simple distinction
chloe = chloe related
bros = everything that is NOT chloe related

it couldn't be more simple

  2929

>>2927

>Not talking Chlobro with Chloe

>2016

 Anonymous (753b) 2930

>>2927

Yeah, because you can't talk chloe with anons. I guess their opinions are not "worthy of note"

  2931

File: 1338505972294.png (274.83 KB, 594x457)

>>2928

'#' threads in /bros/ Gotchya

so when will forced anon occur? how long with the trial last for etc?

  2932

>>2930

>Implying anons are not chlobros.


It duppends on the anon.

 Anonymous (753b) 2933

>>2931

> '#' threads in /bros/ Gotchya


call it whatever you like and do them however you like just remember one thing: it should NOT be chloe related. We clear on that?

  2934

>>2933

You're saying I can't post random Chloe pictures in /bros/?

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2935

>>2930
You can't form an attachment or an opinion on someone who is anon which is why I would prefer it if more people are namefags. Anons are obviously chlobros just like namefags, just I couldn't find a random strangers opinion "worthy of note".

 Anonymous (753b) 2936

>>2934

Yes, you can post random chloe pictures but you are not to have chloe related discussions because that does not belong there

  2937

File: 1338506352803.jpg (151.31 KB, 800x1199)

>>2936

But what happens if Chloe just crops up?

 Anonymous (753b) 2938

>>2935

> I couldn't find a random strangers opinion "worthy of note".


Exactly. He is not a real person with thoughts, feelings, ideas, opinions, points of view and so on.

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2939

>>2936
but threads just randomly go off topic due to some comment. We can't just move to /bros/ every time a thread goes off topic for a couple posts. It would get too confusing. Maybe we just make threads for each topic and if you want to discuss it in detail, go there and the # threads stay the same.

 Anonymous (753b) 2940

>>2937
Then you instantly say "take that stuff to chloe" and if such a thing does not happen then we have a problem and that stricter moderation that was mentioned before would be put into effect.

Let me repeat it again: you can talk about whatever you want and you can post whatever pictures you want (even chloe pics) but if the discussions turn into something chloe related then they will be continued in chloe.

 Anonymous (753b) 2941

>>2939

A couple of posts no but when it turns into actual discussions then yes

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2942

File: 1338506632651.png (179.93 KB, 500x301)

Cant we just keep things the way they are, if these issues where really impinging on people enjoying this place then surely people would have been moaning about these issues from the very start, which they have not.
It seems to me that posting habbits haven't changed just certain anons have become tired of certain namefags.

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2943

>>2940
This is way to stupid to even bother trying. Just keep it the way it is. The system is simple and user friendly and doesn't need any shit changing.

 Anonymous (753b) 2944

>>2942

> It seems to me that posting habbits haven't changed just certain anons have become tired of certain namefags.


that's because namefaggotry has increased so of course some have gotten sick of it.

But like I sad this will be just an experiment which can easily fail and in a week things will be back to just like they are now and it would be like nothing ever happened

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2945

File: 1338506828347.jpg (10.41 KB, 190x164)

>>2944
Grand so. My body is ready.

  2946

File: 1338506855285.gif (5.85 MB, 488x304)

>Can't we just keep '#' threads how they are

I don't care that much if they go to /bros/ but can't we just be allowed to post whatever the fuck we want in them.. anyone who want's more organised Chloe has /chloe/, anything who wants organsied off topic has the rest of /bros/…

 Anonymous (753b) 2947

>>2943

> This is way to stupid to even bother trying.


what? keeping discussion relevant to their actual boards is stupid. REALLY?

> The system is simple and user friendly and doesn't need any shit changing.


some people are having issues with it so yes, it might need changing

 Anonymous (e481) 2948

File: 1338506997383.jpg (81.85 KB, 399x600)

How fucking hard is it to get, /bros/ is a random board that was created for everything RANDOM but mostly for namefags circlejerk,
it's like 4chans /b/,
of course the nasty and disturbing shit will get you banned, but you can talk about ANY FUCKING THING, including chloe, but that should be in /chloe/, because its what is was made for - chloe stuff, but talking about her on /bros/ is not against any rules and nothing will happen to you if you will, but we want all boards run well, not one chaotic copy of /b/ with mostly chloe and namefag shit and two dead boards, we need a balance, and forced anon is a test, things could get better, things could get worse, but we don't know now, so wed like to try and see, end of the story

 Anonymous (753b) 2949

>>2946

you said you want circle jerking you're getting circle jerking

some people want chloe and they're getting chloe

getting the two of them mixed is … well, like it is now, and some have issues with it. But the new solution might be even worse so things can easily go back to normal if that happens.

  2950

File: 1338507096329.jpg (3.61 KB, 190x164)

>>2948

When? for how long etc?

Shall I go create circlejerk general now?

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2951

>>2948
Then fucking do it already. Make us all anon right now.

 Anonymous (753b) 2952

>>2950

> Shall I go create circlejerk general now?


What stopped you until now?

 Anonymous (753b) 2953

File: 1338507185546.jpg (101.81 KB, 698x590)

>>2951

it's not a big on / off switch

  2954

File: 1338507188734.jpg (356.66 KB, 960x1269)

>>2952

I ment in /bros/ silly…

 Anonymous (e481) 2955

>>2942
Not all namefags have been here since the start and they didnt anoy the shit out of other posters as much either

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2956

>>2953
I'm aware of that. I figured that due to your views you would of started the process.

 Anonymous (753b) 2957

File: 1338507269729.jpg (20.79 KB, 153x194)

>>2954

And here I was thinking you want to make the circle jerking thread in chloe

 Anonymous (753b) 2958

>>2956
you were wrong in your assumptions

 Anonymous (e481) 2959

Isn't NED meant for this stuff ?

  2960

File: 1338507349563.jpg (1.13 MB, 1964x3000)

>>2957

Oh you

 Anonymous (753b) 2961

>>2959

Stuff like what? The treads they want? If they want to number them and post chloe pics let them do it

 Anonymous (6a4a) 2962

File: 1338507763433.jpg (48.55 KB, 369x595)

>>2955
It seems fairly similar to me but maybe I have been gradualy accostomed to the divergence that others are having trouble assimilating.
I've been conditioned.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 2963

So, unless I'm mistaken it's only Cheddar and Prufrock really opposed to trying this? That's certainly not surprising giving their constant history disdain for Anons and the anon culture (the very thing image boards are built upon) Other namebros have either expressed willingness to give it a try or at least were not in tears over the idea. Does that about sum it up or did I miss someone?

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2964

>>2963
Prufrock hasn't been here all day…

 Anonymous (753b) 2965

>>2963

How exactly could you miss chlofro?

  2966

>>2963

I don't mind the forced anon that much but the we can't discuss Chloe over at /bros/ is pretty stupid if you ask me..

As long as I can continue '#' threads how they are atm, I'm fine. Whether it be at /Chloe/ or /Bros/

 Anonymous (753b) 2967

File: 1338508769751.jpg (98.38 KB, 604x453)

>>2966

> Chloe over at /bros


chloe belongs in chloe

mother of god even a 5 year old kid could get this

 Anonymous (4c8a) 2968

>>2964
Yes he was, only briefly though. It doesn't take a genius to know his opinion if you've paid attention to past posts. This entire debate probably has something to do with his lack of presence today, since he's so opposed to anon.

In case you haven't noticed, I have serious issues with people bitching about anon culture ON an image board. Anon culture build image boards and you fucking newfags who come in and shit all over that with disrespect make me fucking sick. It's only a few though, I like most all of my namebros just fine. (inb4 chlofro thinks i'm talking about him again, stop being so paranoid)

 Anonymous (e481) 2969

>>2966
just how fucking dumb are you ?

  2970

>>2968

>Do go on


>>2967

But '#' threads have Chloe and Random discussion. Mind=blown

  2971

>>2969

Quite intelligent actually

HOW FUCKING DUMB ARE YOU?

 Anonymous (753b) 2972

>>2970

> But '#' threads have Chloe and Random discussion. Mind=blown


herpa derpa

they always had that, sicnce the time of /b and that is ok in small quantities but uf they go on for too long, if they turn more about circle jerking than about chloe then it should be continued there

 Anonymous (550f) 2973

>>2968
You're a tool and your site still sucks.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 2974

>>2973
>your site
my site?

 Anonymous (753b) 2975

File: 1338510295771.jpg (197.54 KB, 1284x681)

>>2973

> 2012

> still being a bitch

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2976

and I'm done talking the same shit in 2 different boards - Chiles

OH GOD THE FUCKING IRONY. HOLY FUCK. TOO MUCH.

  2977

File: 1338510403030.jpg (851.08 KB, 1745x3000)


 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2978

>>33168
>but if you have a better solution please, pretty please share it with us

Keep everything the same.


There we go.

 Anonymous (753b) 2979

File: 1338510410439.jpg (304.59 KB, 1024x683)


 Anonymous (753b) 2980

File: 1338510460252.jpg (59.34 KB, 531x480)

>>2978

> better

> the same

notice anything wrong here?

  2981

>Keep '#' threads how they are
>Either in /Chloe/ or /bros/
>If people do not want random chloe/discussion/circejerk then they don't have to enter the thread


>Simples

 Anonymous (4c8a) 2982

File: 1338510532936.jpg (86.6 KB, 604x590)

Hey namebros, I tried posting this over on /bros/ but i think it's just chlofro over there crying to himself. That's no fun. Anyway, I wanted to let you guys pick your square, so have at it.

 Anonymous (753b) 2983

File: 1338510573940.jpg (42.94 KB, 500x481)

>>2981

they might want a random discussion about chloe as well as dumping pics /b style

insert coin and try again

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2984

>>2980
My point is that nothing is wrong with what we have. It is perfect, in my opinion.

 Anonymous (753b) 2985

>>2982

cheddar could the 7th one because hes a nigger

I call dibs on the last one

  2986

>>2982

Bitch please, I already picked mine.

>Forgetting about Cheddar crying too.

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2987

>>2982
>inb4 some hilarious mother fucker tags me as the black kid

  2988

>>2983

>Like /b/ style

>Moan about /b/ style

niggeryoujustwentfullretarded

  2989

>>2987

Too late

>>2985

 Anonymous (753b) 2990

>>2984

> It is perfect, in my opinion.


How can it be perfect when people are complaining about it?

They complained about the dating drama I made a separate thread. They complain about namefags circle jerking .. that has no easy solution.

Like I said in a week from now things could be back to the way they are now if that solution is worse than the current one

 Anonymous (4c8a) 2991

>>2981
I guess you don't get the fact still that actual valuable chloe related posts occur in almost every # thread, but trying to find them in a sea of unrelated posts is very very time consuming. Not everyone can spend every hour of the day here posting so after several hours being away it can become rather frustrating to find what you need. Courtesy to fellow chlobros seems to be at the bottom of the list of a few of you here.

 Anonymous (753b) 2992

>>2988

> random discussion ABOUT CHLOE

> dump pics
> NO MENTION OF NAMEFAGS CIRCLKE JERKING
> niggeryoujustwentfullretarded

you're the retard, bro

  2993

File: 1338510923033.jpg (54.94 KB, 944x606)

>>2991

But there can be specific threads for the Chloe parts

 Anonymous (4c8a) 2994

>>2985
>I call dibs on the last one
>Posts as anon

useful, very useful

 Anonymous (753b) 2995

File: 1338510948555.gif (1.46 MB, 338x300)

>>2991

> Courtesy


never heard of that namefag

 Anonymous (753b) 2996

File: 1338511002680.jpg (43 KB, 400x392)

>>2994

> useful, very useful


that's the fun of being an anon

  2997

>Still hasn't been answered.

When will force anon occur? and for how long?

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 2998

>>2997
Planning the chickenshit.

mybodyisready.jpg

 Anonymous (4c8a) 2999

File: 1338511392539.jpg (128.07 KB, 604x590)

squares are going quick, get yours fast!

  3000

>>2999

Safe blud

>Including Pruf…

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3001

>>2999
Chiles = far bottom left.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3002

>>3001
sorry, "chiles" in an anon.

 Anonymous (753b) 3003

>>2998

ooorrrr
ooorrrrrrrr

we don't even implement it
you and those like you take their shit to bros when it gets out of hand
and everybody gets what they want

but that would require you to make an effort and actually give 2 fucks about your fellow chlobros

  3004

>>3003

>give 2 fucks about your fellow chlobros


Oh the IRON-E

 Anonymous (e481) 3005

>>3004
seriously?

  3006

>>3005

Yes….

 Anonymous (e481) 3007

File: 1338512242587.jpg (33.67 KB, 581x589)

>>3006
Worse then i thought…

  3008

>>3007

The same to you…

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3009

File: 1338512342394.jpg (37.81 KB, 470x325)

>>3007
Not sure which anon is Chillies…

 Anonymous (753b) 3010

>>3004

you got me
yeah bro, I'm the one who (along with echo) decided to make a chan for us when b kicked us out, when the old chan wouldn't accept us and when none of you did anything about it

I'm the one who's loosing his sleep time and probably getting late at work tomorrow because he spent his night arguing on the interwebs and trying to find a compromise between two very different camps

you're right, I don't give a fuck about my fellow chlobros


I guess you and cheddar do though. I mean you guys came up with such good solutions to our predicament that no one can deny how much you care

I mean sure, one could say that all this bullshit could be over if you decided to say

"hey, if chloe threads get oo much out of hand we'll continue our off topic discussion in bros out of respect for my fellow chlobros"

but that's not something that can happen it seems

  3011

File: 1338512787881.jpg (68.35 KB, 688x464)

>Implying I knew it was you

>old chan wouldn't accept us


What?

>Late too work


Go to sleep man. Who gives a fuck what I? or some random loser posts on a chan about a 15yo.

Work > Chloe.

 Anonymous (753b) 3012

>>3011

> >old chan wouldn't accept us


Someone doesn't know his chlobro history


> Go to sleep man. Who gives a fuck what I? or some random loser posts on a chan about a 15yo.


The guys who made the chan about some 15yr olds where random losers post care

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3013

>>3010
# threads have some element of being off topic. It is just the way it is. The subject threads are there for the specific topics and the # are for fun Chloe things.
If we end up talking about things which aren't Chloe for too long and some anons ask us to go to /bros/ then the people who are involved in the conversation will do so but there should not be a rule about this, it should be out of courtesy.

I also want to know why people want no off-topic discussion? We can't talk about Chloe all day. Shit would get stale.

 Anonymous (753b) 3014

File: 1338513104172.jpg (42.62 KB, 400x402)

>>3013

Holy shit cheddar made a post where he didn't act like a total twat for a change

I must be tired. brb, cleaning my eyes

  3015

>>3012

>History


Ok bro….whatever

I had to problem with the old chan

>inb4 go back to it


If it was fixed, I would.

>The guys who made the chan about some 15yr old where random losers post cares


Fair enough, I'm just saying if you were smart enough you'd realise work > Chloe. ←- If you were the guy calling me dumb..


If not…

Still Work > Chloe

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3016

>>3014
Holy shit! An anon made a post which makes him look like a douche! This isn't like you!

 Anonymous (753b) 3017

>>3015

I know you had no problem with it since you're the only one mourning it.

But I guess if you wanted a chan with
- no dirty jokes (like trevor being gay)
- bannable words (like nigger)
- wordfilters
- no sexual inuendos
etc

then that would be a good place.


But I am grateful to them for one thing: if they didn't kick us out this place wouldn't have been made.

 Anonymous (e481) 3018

>>3013
Maybe, but are you gonna move ? NOOOOO !!!
what you gonna do instead ? maybe bitch about it ? YEEEEAAAAH !!!
football thread is the perfect example, chiles had to make it for you to move the fuck out with that shit and everyone was happy ever since, if you can't handle your shit, we'll do it for you, whether you like or not, deal with it
and as i already said, we need a balance, your "solution" supports the chaos on chloe and kills off one other board, this may not be the perfect idea, i realize it, but we have nothing better right now, at least imo, i think this little change is for the best
We want off topic discussions, we have off topic discussions, we just want to have some fucking order here

 Anonymous (753b) 3019

>>3016

You're the one who's been acting like a nigger the whole time.

>>3014

> If we end up talking about things which aren't Chloe for too long and some anons ask us to go to /bros/ then the people who are involved in the conversation will do so but there should not be a rule about this, it should be out of courtesy.


it took you so long to finally get what we were saying this whole time? Yes, it shouldn't be a rule. It should be something you do out of respect for the other users here. A common courtesy if you will

> I also want to know why people want no off-topic discussion? We can't talk about Chloe all day. Shit would get stale.



There's a difference between no offtopic discussion and circle jerking / completely making the threads about something else. What we want is somewhere in the middle

 Anonymous (e481) 3020

>>3015

Knowing shit but acting and trying to argue like you swallowed wikipedia, you just never cease to amaze me

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3021

>>3018
>Maybe, but are you gonna move ? NOOOOO !!!
what you gonna do instead ? maybe bitch about it ? YEEEEAAAAH !!!

Are you retarded?


> the chaos on chloe


Are you retarded?

>if you can't handle your shit, we'll do it for you, whether you like or not, deal with it


That's the spirit! Team chlobro!

>>3019

>You're the one who's been acting like a nigger the whole time


>Irony


>it took you so long to finally get what we were saying this whole time?


That isn't exactly what you've been saying.



Can you put Chilies as your name for these big discussions?

 Anonymous (753b) 3022

>>3021


> That isn't exactly what you've been saying.


Then what exactly have I been saying? Please explain in few simple terms

> Can you put Chilies as your name for these big discussions?


yeah, sure, I'll become a namefag for you

 Anonymous (e481) 3023

>>3021
>Are you retarded ?

>Are you retarded ?


>That's the spirit! Team chlobro!


Ladies and gentlemen, the true master of conversasions, all of of the points i made were wiped off the table with his celestail logic, shall we bow to you know ?

sure, im definitly the one who's retarded here. for even replying to you knowing it's just as useful as screaming at bannana

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3024

>>3023
>Judging me from an ironic post

Lets start from the beginning.
Why is /chloe/ such "chaos"

 Anonymous (753b) 3025

>>3024

how about you reply to my post instead or picking some argument for the sake of it?


> Then what exactly have I been saying? Please explain in few simple terms

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3026

>>3024
Again? it's been explained to you a dozen times. You are too wrapped up in yourself to realize the issues. That's the real problem here. In your mind: you don't see an issue = there's not an issue. Nothing anyone else can say will change your view.

 Anonymous (753b) 3027

File: 1338515443967.jpg (121.16 KB, 1153x720)

okay, fuck this. I'm too tired for this shit and something tells me it would be nothing more than repeating what's been said already far too many times

 Anonymous (e481) 3028

>>3024
i already explained it twice, are you just trying buy some time, are you not reading posts, or are you just stupid ?
The bros shit is in chloe and people are mad, complaining, boards arent being used as they should be, certain namefags are too stubborn to listen, then fights are happening on boards…its a fucking mess, are you blind ?

 Anonymous (e481) 3029

>>3027
We already passed that point very long time ago…

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3030

>>3026
>In your mind: you don't see an issue = there's not an issue

No. I wanted you to outline the issues so my opinion is what I think it is.

>>3028
I started writing out a load of shit again but you being a bigot, it doesn't matter. I've shared my opinion and it doesn't get through.

I'll probably just chickenshit until it all blows over.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3031

>>3030
>I started writing out a load of shit again
we agree on something!

 Raep-fayce (550f) 3032

Are i banned yet?

 Narwhal !FEMoretzV6 3033

File: 1338523613104.jpg (73.54 KB, 580x387)


 Anonymous (753b) 3034

File: 1338533650465.jpg (48.95 KB, 600x323)

>>3030

I'm still waiting for you to explain "exactly what I said (in few, simple terms". Can you do that?

Because the way I see it is for hours you and chlofro argued against what we said, then as soon as he left you changed your tune saying pretty much the same thing we did except you made it seems like it was some sort of novelty.

>>3032

For what? Turning from a chlobro namefag (one of the better ones) into an anon troll / bitch is not a crime. It's just sad to see

>

 Narwhal !FEMoretzV6 3035

File: 1338534692211.jpg (7.39 KB, 208x224)

But if we are forced anon i cant have cool trip :((((((

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3036

>>3034
I was under the impression that every time a thread got off-topic for more than 10 posts or something, that would mean that the topic should move to /bros/. I'm saying that if there is a topic where its conclusion isn't close to ending, people who care can request we move to the NED thread on /bros/. Just keep it all normal but encourage the people who want to start bitching because we aren't talking about Chloe can do so. Regular chat is what the # threads are based on.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3037

>>3035
but b..but
>>>/bros/

 Anonymous (753b) 3038

>>3036

10 posts or something? Now you're making shit up. And a lot of those # threads are based around regular chat about chloe and that is why most people are or should be here in the first place

and I shouldn't just encourage just the people who have a problem with it, I should also encourage the people who actually cause it. You should be able to judge for yourself when a topic is getting derailed too much, when it becomes too much about circle jerking and so on and at that point you should invite the people partaking in that discussion to bros out of courtesy

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3039

>>3038
>10 posts or something? Now you're making shit up.

Then give me a guideline right now. How many posts is it?

> You should be able to judge for yourself when a topic is getting derailed too much


No because I don't know what the limit is. If a load of anons decide that they're mad enough to ask us to leave then they can do it but if no one thinks that we need to leave and we decide to anyway then the community is split unnecessarily.

 Anonymous (753b) 3040

>>3039

So what you're basically saying is that you are unable to judge for yourself and you need others to do that for you. That courtesy that keeps getting mentioned can't work without some common sense.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3041

>>3039
We don't want to bitch or ask you to leave constantly because it brings a negative tone. We don't like anon vs namebros. We love Chloe, you love Chloe, that's what really matters, but the two groups do have different ideas on why they are here. I want everyone to post on /chloe/ too. Post Chloe related here. Post bro related stuff in /bros/. The thing is that's not happening at the frequency that it should so /bros/ as it was designed goes most unused and everything goes on /chloe/. Forced anon here should alleviate it. If it fails after a week then so be it, but don't say you'll change because it's not going to happen and there's no need to change, just get your namebro fix on /bros/.

This is still difficult to understand?

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3042

>>3040
No. I'm saying that if no one asks us to move then we probably don't need to and if I don't know how many posts it takes for a anon to start bitching then I can't judge whether the conversation should move or not.

I'll be back later.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3043

>>3040
You nailed the problem on it's head. Some can't judge when enough is enough and go too far over and over again. Others get stressed and bitch, namefags bitch back and then clusterfucks everywhere.

It's not even realistic to think that it will change. It just flies over their heads. Anon becomes the bad guy and everyone hates everyone else.

Forced anon in my mind should alleviate this as seeing the name of your "buddy" post can cause things to go off topic pretty quick. That's obvious, so go be buddies on /bros/

 Anonymous (753b) 3044

>>3042

You are not a kid, please don't ask me to treat you as one. There can be no clear lines so don't ask me for them.

What do you want? if 10 posts of the last 20 posts in chloe are not chloe related then the discussion should continue in bros? But what exactly constitutes a chloe related post? How can one even define such a thing?

Don't ask me to come up with a stupid set of rules and trying to strictly delimit something that is fairly subjective.

All I'm asking that that you have a minimum amount of decency. But if that or common sense are unknown to you then maybe you can try something like this and get others judging for you

for every 10 non chloe related posts (by your definition of the term) you make in # threads you should ask the people there if you should continue that in bros

so that should solve your problem and you will be known as the guy who keeps spamming

hey, should I take this to bros?
hey, should I take this to bros?
hey, should I take this to bros?
hey, should I take this to bros?
hey, should I take this to bros?

because he's the only one who can't apparently think for himself

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3045

>>3041
>We don't like anon vs namebros

It seems like anons thrive on complaining about namefags.

>the two groups do have different ideas on why they are here


Why do you think I'm here? I'm here for Chloe and to chat with the people here.

>just get your namebro fix on /bros/.


I'm not on Chloe with a name as a status thing. I'm not trying to get attention from it. It is just way easier to participate in discussions when you have an identity and people don't have to piece together whose post might be whose. Also, people should know who everyone is and be able to get to know who they want. If everyone is anon then there's no friendships therefore there's less fun and no one has any beef with anyone which also makes it even more dull.

>>3044
I just don't want to be taking things to /bros/ when I don't need to.

I'm very much looking forward to the forced anon and the split threads week to see how it turns out. It will be VERY interesting to watch.

 DANGER;prodigy!!txc0ZK1Cc6 3046

File: 1338538755374.jpg (176.45 KB, 537x550)

>>3045
My respect for Cheddar went from -3 to -2.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3047

>>3045
Posting Chloe, talking about Chloe, making Chloe related OC/Macros, having small bouts off topic chit chat is what I think is fun. I don't need to know who you are to do that. You are on an imageboard bro, I've told you this before, but what you are looking for is a traditional forum (required to register to post) or chat room. Is that really hard for you to understand? You never answer me when I ask so I guess it is.

>Imageboards, similar to bulletin board systems, are used for discussions of a variety of topics. The primary focus of imageboards, however, is directed away from text posts, and is instead placed on picture posts.


>Most imageboards and 2channel-style discussion boards allow (and encourage) anonymous posting

>allow (and encourage) anonymous posting
>allow (and encourage)
>anonymous posting

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imageboard

Most of us here are aware of this culture, so you just come off like an asshole telling us we should all have names. You really should consider this first and do some research on your own about the type of site you are posting on before pushing these ideas.

 Anonymous (753b) 3048

>>3045

> I just don't want to be taking things to /bros/ when I don't need to.


and I just don't want people complaining about excessive namefagging when they're here for chloe so that would require for you to SOMETIMES take it to bros. If you really are unable to judge for yourself use the 10 posts rule (because you need clearly delimited lines) and then ask that question to the people in the thread.

You are part of the problem. Why don't you want to be part of the solution?

 DANGER;prodigy!!txc0ZK1Cc6 3049

File: 1338539439053.jpg (23.2 KB, 230x384)

>>3048
>anon

 Anonymous (753b) 3050

>>3049

proposed solution: have namefags take their shit to bros when it gets out of hand

what you get: eliminate all namefags

you have some serious comprehension issues Flavor Flav

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3051

for clarity

>Most imageboards and 2channel-style discussion boards allow (and encourage) anonymous posting

>allow (and encourage) anonymous posting
>allow (and encourage)
>allow
>(and encourage)
>encourage
>encourage
>anonymous posting

 DANGER;prodigy!!txc0ZK1Cc6 3052

File: 1338539941003.jpg (46.76 KB, 640x480)

>>3050
>proposed solution
we're getting on the trains to the camps(bros). the final solution comes soon after.

>what you get: eliminate all namefags

>exterminate
>eliminate
>saying I have comprehension issues
>Flavor Flav

nice watch

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3053

>>3047
>Is that really hard for you to understand? You never answer me when I ask so I guess it is.

You actually think I would answer such a pathetic question?

All I did was give points on why I have a name. I didn't tell you or anyone else to have a name. I don't have a problem with people being anon. The assumption you just made was ridiculous.

 Anonymous (753b) 3054

File: 1338540206502.jpg (28.63 KB, 300x300)

>>3052

> we're getting on the trains to the camps(bros).


No, you are simply asked to take it yourself there when you or the others in the thread feel it belongs there.

I'm sure Hitler went

"well, when you start acting like too much of a jew or when the locals complain you can take that shit to israel"

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3055

>>3053
o really?

>Also, people should know who everyone is and be able to get to know who they want. If everyone is anon then there's no friendships therefore there's less fun and no one has any beef with anyone which also makes it even more dull.

>Also, people should know who everyone is and be able to get to know who they want.
>Also, people should know who everyone is

But yeah, you didn't say that right?

My question was legit, you are being pathetic and crying about something not being how you want it when that's just how things are on an imageboard. Deal. With. It.

 DANGER;prodigy!!txc0ZK1Cc6 3056

File: 1338540512840.jpg (281.76 KB, 507x754)

Why didn't chiles just come out and say it. This would have all gone much easier.

A /bros/ board was made but no one is using it. He went through all that trouble of making it and it just sits there. Chloe is for chloe. bros is for everything else. chloe is being poluted by all you guys bullshit. Use bros or you get the ban hammer from now on.



I love how its never mentioned that anons contribute to non chloe related things on /chloe/ as well. As if if forced anon is implemented that everything on chloe will suddenly only be about chloe and all other side talk will magically disappear.

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3057

>>3055
>Also, people should know who everyone is

Yes. My opinion is that you should choose to have a name if you want and I gave points to why I believe that it is a good idea to do so but the option to be anonymous is fair enough. I didn't tell you to do anything.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3058

>>3057
Learn english then because when you tell someone what they should do you are telling them they should do that and not something else. So everyone SHOULD know everyone else. The only real way for that to happen is to have everyone with names. So it's easy to assume that means everyone SHOULD have names.

 Anonymous (8869) 3059

File: 1338541085067.png (531.32 KB, 600x464)


 Anonymous (753b) 3060

>>3056

I never said anything about any banhammer. Last thing I want is to ban people or delete posts. It's the reason why I want to avoid strict rules as much as possible. I am politely asking you to take that to bros ** ONLY WHEN IT GETS OUT OF HAND **

There's a pretty big difference between asking politely and ban hammer don't you think?
Just like there's a difference between courtesy and not giving a fuck about the others.

Anons don't take things as offtopic as much as namefags (shocker, I know). Also, they have caused some problem too, just like namefags have - which is now why we have the drama thread (since people complained about it).

They also complained about all the circle jerking and no one is even saying you should go to a separate place for it, only on the ocassiosn when it becomes too much. You also have an entire board at your disposal for namefagging.

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3061

File: 1338541449236.jpg (42.94 KB, 500x481)

>>3058
Yes…my opinion is that you SHOULD have a name because of my previous points. That is my opinion and you can choose to acknowledge it or not.

>>3059
>

 Anonymous (8869) 3062

File: 1338541499117.jpg (77.04 KB, 500x489)

>>3061
i'm sarreh chedz

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3063

>>3062
That's ok Dante.

 DANGER;prodigy!!txc0ZK1Cc6 3064

File: 1338541715902.jpg (1.28 MB, 3168x4752)

>>3060
I'm saying that you SHOULD have told everyone that they would get the banhammer. I know you would never do it but it would have been better at convincing people to move /bros/ if you threatened them.

 Anonymous (753b) 3065

File: 1338542027169.jpg (185.67 KB, 1280x720)

>>3064

that's like beating a dog with a stick until he gets it

As I said before I like to think I'm dealing with people not animals so maybe we can understand each other like normal people. No one is asking for the namefaggotry or off topic to stop in the # threads, all that I'm asking for is that you continue in bros when it gets out of hand like a small gesture of courtesy for your fellow chlobros who might actually be here for chloe and not the circle jerking.

inb4hitlerwearingawatch

 DANGER;prodigy!!txc0ZK1Cc6 3066

File: 1338542256814.jpg (56.88 KB, 639x474)

>>3065
Why didn't chiles just come out and say it. This would have all gone much easier.

Chlofro, beanz, chedz, cut all the bullshit.

 Mr. Bean!!9bINe43AAo 3067

File: 1338542500778.png (209.93 KB, 344x369)


 Anonymous (97bb) 3068

When?

 Anonymous (753b) 3069

File: 1338591311161.jpg (76.37 KB, 600x450)


 Narwhal !FEMoretzV6 3070

File: 1338610373460.jpg (676.99 KB, 1000x835)

4 relz

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3071

File: 1338611286284.png (150.92 KB, 1125x681)


 Anonymous (a57d) 3072

File: 1338612034822.jpg (233.62 KB, 2262x688)


 Anonymous (4c8a) 3073

File: 1338612268392.jpg (179.18 KB, 589x564)


 Narwhal !FEMoretzV6 3074

File: 1338613131692.jpg (33.06 KB, 425x589)

>>3073

Oh shit i also have no valid argument so ill post a photo

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3075

File: 1338613579745.jpg (206.63 KB, 1414x1263)


 Anonymous (a57d) 3076

>>2871
>Forced anon good or bad?

bad

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3077

File: 1338643918505.png (138.74 KB, 218x247)

>>3076
Well said. Maybe you could expand on that?

 Anonymous (753b) 3078

File: 1338647736160.jpg (18.03 KB, 300x371)

Forced anon is in place on the /chloe/ board for one week

 Anonymous (e797) 3079

File: 1338648199760.png (280.94 KB, 632x565)

AWWWWW SHIET NIGGER SHIT JUSTG GGOT REAL

BTW WHEN TYPING THIS THE "NEW REPLY" COVERS UP A PRT OF THE TEXT WHEN TYPING

 Anonymous (753b) 3080

>>3079

refresh / clear cache and refresh

 Anonymous (e797) 3081

File: 1338648396699.jpg (18.56 KB, 444x473)

>>3080

ye ye

  3082

Cool, let's see how it goes then.

 Anonymous (6b0b) 3083

File: 1338649197249.jpg (167.98 KB, 683x384)

What if I just sign my name after every post? Does that make me an ultimate faggot?
IM NOT GONNA BE PART OF YOUR SYSTEM
>

^CR

 Anonymous (753b) 3084

File: 1338649576452.jpg (63.85 KB, 360x225)

>>3083

> Does that make me an ultimate faggot?


Pretty much

 Anonymous (e797) 3085

File: 1338649918748.png (154.47 KB, 670x580)

avatar-fag time

 Anonymous (6b0b) 3086

File: 1338650184172.png (370.43 KB, 604x488)

>>3084
Expect masses amounts of faggotry.
^CR

 Anonymous (753b) 3087

File: 1338650494854.jpg (17.78 KB, 210x230)

>>3086

I would expect nothing less from you

 Anonymous (6b0b) 3088

File: 1338654560601.jpg (187.62 KB, 333x500)

>>3087
haha. I hate you.

 Anonymous (753b) 3089

File: 1338656819706.jpg (66.23 KB, 420x500)


 Anonymous (e481) 3090

File: 1338659674719.jpg (1.28 MB, 3168x4752)

>>3088
You forgot to sign yourself

 Anonymous (6b0b) 3091

>>3090
Couldn't be bothered any more.

 Anonymous (a57d) 3092

gay

 Anonymous (753b) 3093

File: 1338665125301.jpg (99.77 KB, 400x516)

>>3092

said the guy who posted the gayest pic ever to be shown here

 Anonymous (a57d) 3094

File: 1338673749326.jpg (663.45 KB, 1536x1392)

>>3093
>gayest pic ever to be shown here

 Anonymous (97bb) 3095

>>3094

>Implying you wouldn't hit that

 Anonymous (6b0b) 3096

>>3095
>on the head
>with a baton

 Anonymous (97bb) 3097

>>3096

>On the ass

>With an erect cock

 Anonymous (97bb) 3098

>>34307

Thanks, not sure whose skirt I want to look up more

 Anonymous (e481) 3099

File: 1338677150089.jpg (50.89 KB, 1035x528)

>>34307
Dude, there are no names for a reason, stop being a faggot

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3100

>>3098
We've already had a peak up Chloe's so it's Trevor's turn.

 Anonymous (6b0b) 3101

File: 1338677231149.jpg (167.98 KB, 683x384)

>>3099
Never in my life.
>

 Anonymous (97bb) 3102

>>3100

3 peaks actually

 Anonymous (8869) 3103

File: 1338677538246.jpg (50.69 KB, 297x310)

>>3097
u just went full…i dunno nigga, really

 Anonymous (8869) 3104

File: 1338677711715.gif (313.86 KB, 250x150)

>>34317
>>34315
nigga u are not me

 Anonymous (e481) 3105

>>34316
>>34317
Stop it goddamnit

 Anonymous (6b0b) 3106

File: 1338677868786.jpg (594.68 KB, 1920x800)

>>34320
Oh come on. Lets not do this.

 Anonymous (8869) 3107

File: 1338677883257.jpg (27.8 KB, 639x471)

>>3105
dude it's not me, really

 Anonymous (97bb) 3108

>>3107

gooby pls

 Anonymous (8869) 3109

File: 1338677988475.gif (475.59 KB, 500x269)

>>3108
>>34317
>

 Anonymous (e0ca) 3110

File: 1338678017230.jpg (109.78 KB, 480x646)

People are more butthurt in this thread than the baaaawwwrr dating thread.

Forced anon will not work unless people get banned for using names.

Otherwise namefags will just use subject as name - or write it in the Comment on first line or as a signature etc.

What is the point?

 Anonymous (8869) 3111

File: 1338678144845.png (5.64 KB, 500x57)

>>3110
dude, i'm a namefag, i'm not using the subject shit, someone is trolling, for realz

 Anonymous (97bb) 3112

>>3110

I'm not doing it…..

 Anonymous (6b0b) 3113

>>3110
>Otherwise namefags will just use subject as name - or write it in the Comment on first line or as a signature etc.

Yup, I will.

Just put things back to the way they were. Everyone should choose whether to have a name or not.

 Anonymous (8869) 3114

File: 1338678443120.jpg (18.03 KB, 337x425)

fuck this shit, fucking trolls

 Anonymous (7d1e) 3115

File: 1338678471547.png (107.44 KB, 361x360)

>>34320
Tch…

 Anonymous (753b) 3116

>>3110

You are absolutely right. Apparently some people have a problem obeying some simple rules. We said we would try this for a week but some namefags here couldn't even last for one day.


>>3113

> Yup, I will.

> Just put things back to the way they were. Everyone should choose whether to have a name or not.

Let's get one thing straight here: you don't make the rules. You have a voice but so does every other user here. We debated about this forced anon thing, enough people were ok with that so that we could try it just for one week. How hard is it to respect that?

Too hard apparently. Both you and chlofro got a one day ban and this is 100% your fault. If you wanted namefagging you could have went to bros or you could have tried posting as an anon here for one week because it wouldn't have killed you.

But I guess expecting you to obey some simple and short term rules was asking for too much. I am getting sick and tired of trying to be polite here with a bunch of people who act like assholes. The next time you do this shit you get a 2 day ban. The next time that happens you get your permaban and your entire post history will be deleted and it will be like you never existed here.

So once your 1 day ban expires and when / if you come back you can either chose to respect the rules like everyone here has, or you can choose to get kicked out. It's ENTIRELY YOUR CHOICE

 Anonymous (27e9) 3117

>>3116
I was just messing saying all the 'system' stuff and posting with a name. You could of just given me a formal warning and I would of stopped.

 Anonymous (753b) 3118

>>3117

Don't blame me for your lack of common sense and like I said I'm tired of asking politely.

 Anonymous (e481) 3119

File: 1338680505394.gif (490.06 KB, 390x210)

>>3117
Fuck you,
you were given enough warnings
This decision was made for a reason and if you keep disrespecting it i'll take it as you're breaking the rules, if you still don't get why, i will not write it again for you, i already said that scrolling is really not that hard, you got banned because nothing else will obviously work here

And no, this isn't chiles, there are more people around here that your stupidity and stuborness pisses off
Seriously, i don't want to have any fights and butthurt people here but it's the best time for you to stop acting like bunch of faggots and start respecting decisions of people who made this place for you, otherwise youd be still posting on /b/ with your thread getting deleted every 5minutes or on your now dead chloe grace chan, or you can pack your shit and leave, i know you love your identities and crave attention but you have a different board for this, one week, one motherfucking week, to see if things could get better, is it really that hard for you? if so, it really isn't my problem, but yours because i won't let you fuck this up
you obviously can't see the limit till it hits you in the face

 Anonymous (27e9) 3120

File: 1338680642760.jpg (54.17 KB, 600x800)

>>3118
At no point did you say that I wasn't allowed to have my name in the subject or mark it in my comment. You literally could of said 'Cheddar, if you carry on posting whilst marking your name, I'll ban you for 24 hours' and I would of stopped. You don't need to ban anyone.

 Anonymous (4c8a) 3121

>>3120
OMG you really are a fucking child. I thought this site was 18+ only?

 Anonymous (753b) 3122

>>3120

> At no point did you say that I wasn't allowed to have my name in the subject or mark it in my comment. You literally could of said 'Cheddar, if you carry on posting whilst marking your name, I'll ban you for 24 hours' and I would of stopped. You don't need to ban anyone.


IT'S COMMON FUCKING SENSE you damn tool

We abolish namefagging for a week here. Next thing you do is come in and use a name … and you thought that wouldn't have been a problem? DO you actually put some thought into your actions or are they just reflexes?

And I am done talking. I've talked and talked in the most simple and explicit manner and some people still don't get it so if words don't seem to make you understand then maybe action will do.


Understand that you made a mistake. Maybe you think the punishment is too big but nevertheless you deserve it. Now be a good chap and stay on the sideline (and that goes for chlofro too) for one day so that hopefully you'll learn something from it. Or, keep posting and things will get nasty.

Like I said I don't want to ban people and I don't want to delete posts. But you're sure asking for it and now you finally got it. Learn to take it and maybe we can all come to an agreement and put this drama to rest. It's all up to you

 Anonymous (e481) 3123

File: 1338681375046.jpg (250.52 KB, 640x480)

>>3122
>1 day ban
>punishment is too big

 Anonymous (753b) 3124

File: 1338681560544.png (196.35 KB, 296x306)

>>3123

Well he seems to think that way.

Funniest shit I've read all day:

> you should have issued a warning first


As if using words had any effect on them

>

 Anonymous (e481) 3125

File: 1338682493584.jpg (50.89 KB, 1035x528)


>>3124

aside from the fact that he's the most brainfucked poster ive seen around here:
>>3105
>>34258
>>3101
>>3099

 Anonymous (81df) 3126

File: 1338683687452.jpg (176.68 KB, 980x553)

Really guys? Really? I don't know if you did that because you knew I would evade it or because you actually think I actually deserved it. This was what I was about to post:
___
>>3122
Alright, I get you, fair play. I shouldn't of posted with a name, I was just protesting the decision. I deserve getting banned for alot of shit really. Speak to you guys in 23 hours 30 minutes.

>>3124
It is for someone who spends 24 hours out of 48 on here on weekends.

Probably best to ban me again. I'll get the temptation.

___
Just put it back on for 23 hours and we'll talk about it in then. I hope to see you then. Alternatively, come on facebook quickly and we can sort things out.

 Anonymous (6a4a) 3127

File: 1338684126782.gif (1.02 MB, 225x260)

Can I just inquire as to who is being the tool here, chlofro or cheddar so that I may suitable harbour negative feeling against the offending party when/if names return at some point.
>gif semi related

 Anonymous (753b) 3128

>>3127

Both of them are equally bad. Cheddar is causing the most ruckus but chlofro did a very bad thing by impersonating other users. Sometimes trolling crosses the line and it sure did in his case

 Anonymous (6a4a) 3129

>>3128
Who did he impersonate?

 Anonymous (753b) 3130

>>3129

dante and a few others

 Anonymous (a57d) 3131

File: 1338688390579.jpg (8.46 KB, 459x526)

i used to be impersonation proof. then chiles saveed all my shit perfectly.

 Anonymous (753b) 3132

File: 1338688628256.png (91.91 KB, 243x284)

>>3131

> I used to be a bitch

> but then I remained one

 Anonymous (a57d) 3133

File: 1338688804716.jpg (23.2 KB, 230x384)

so the forced anon thing evolved into banning namefags and eventually permaban. Why am i not surprised.

 Anonymous (753b) 3134

>>3133

forced anon evolved into namefags being namefags and disobeying the rules and they got a small ban for it

you might not be surprised because you are fully aware that the faggotry that comes with it

 Anonymous (a57d) 3135

File: 1338689125312.jpg (51.57 KB, 249x249)

>>3134
>implying anons aren't fags

 Anonymous (753b) 3136

File: 1338689340571.jpg (85.95 KB, 604x453)

>>3135

They might be. But at least they can respect some simple rules

 Anonymous (73ba) 3137

File: 1338737408259.jpg (97.14 KB, 600x584)

>>2871
Chloe hates namefags, therefore it's a good idea.

 Anonymous (e797) 3138

>>3137

[citation needed]

 Anonymous (a57d) 3139

File: 1338788581983.jpg (72.63 KB, 588x758)

>forced anon

 Forced anon is off Anonymous (753b) 3140

It's been a week since we implemented forced anon. There were two reasons why we tried this

1) too see if it would bring in more lurkers

There are plenty of people lurking on this site and a lot of them are regular visitors. By implementing forced anon every user would seem equal so it would be easier for them to fit it. I didn't see any noticeable increase in new posters and I don't see what else can be done for them

- it's an imageboard so you don't need to make an account like on a forum plus there's not even a captcha so posting can not be more simple than this

- every time a new guy came in he was welcomed with open arms

what else would they need? I have no idea. I guess some people love to lurk though you'd think that if you're big enough fan of chloe and you visit this place regularly you might have something to say at one point. I give up and trying to understand their mentality.


but more importantly the other thing we tried to achieve with this forced anon thing was

2) reduce the circle jerking to keep the chloe threads more focused on chloe (what an outlandish concept, I know).

This part worked brilliantly. There was a considerable increase in namefagging and circle jerking without a drop in posting so it would make perfect sense that we keep this and make it a permanent thing. But we won't .We said it would only last a week. We have no problem with namefags (and a lot of them were or are great guys) but we do have a problem with chloe threads derailing too much and being about some things of zero relevance to her.

Some people need to understand that they might ruin chloe time for others so they should continue their off-topic discussion on /bros/ for as long as they want. I won't mention any warnings, deleting posts or bans because we should be able to understand each other like normal people that share a common passion and have a small amount of respect for their fellow chlobros.

Those users who think that some posters here are taking a chloe thread too off-topic can invite those individuals to continue their discussion in bros, and those mentioned should respect that.

Obviously this is far from a perfect solution but such a thing doesn't exist. All we need is to find a compromise solution to please both camps (those who just want chloe and those who might want a little offtopic chit chat) without pissing each other off. We need to find that limit where an offtopic discussion starts bothering other users and then respect that limit.

You could say things are just as they were a week ago but that's not true. This week proved that forced anon can work. Now, just like that "adding a unique user ID" thing this can be the last time we discuss force anon. That thing was buried and it will NEVER be implemented. This force anon rule can share it's faith but it's all up to you. If some people here will learn to respect other users and their chloe time then we will never ever see forced anon again

 Anonymous (ebb1) 3141

File: 1339262765725.gif (496.08 KB, 500x359)


 Mr. Bean!!9bINe43AAo 3142

File: 1339269720552.png (118.57 KB, 246x361)

If it wasn't for 1 or 2 irrelevant anons (Yeah, fuck anon now) this shit wouldn't have had to happen. Forced_anon made this place a ghost town for most of the duration and [size=9001]hopefully[/size] you'll see sense in not ever using forced_anon here again.

Buttmad anons don't bother replying because I don't care what you think.

 Anonymous (753b) 3143

File: 1339270026647.jpg (110.02 KB, 600x541)


 Anonymous (6a4a) 3144

File: 1339282473345.jpg (110.3 KB, 1280x688)

>>3142
I was neither pro or con on the forced anon but let it be know that it was hardly a ghost town and if it was it was like that because people like you and your warped reasons for being here. If yall were here for chloe time then forced anon shouldn't have affected traffic from you lot, that is all.

 Anonymous (97bb) 3145

>Still namefagging
>10/6/12

  3146

File: 1339292116846.gif (290.77 KB, 160x200)

Forced anon is a good idea. Finally I can share my opinion on this subject.

Well, I think chlomo should ban the name field. We don't need to identify ourselves. That's useless.

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3147

File: 1339292258811.jpg (118.9 KB, 736x498)

>>3146
>has name
>wants to ban names
>

  3148

File: 1339292385809.jpg (522.27 KB, 995x918)

>>3147
Do what I say, not what I do.

 Narwhal!ImFaBoosTI 3149

>>3146

You can post anon as freely as you like

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3150

File: 1339293899425.jpg (842.59 KB, 2635x3000)

>>3149
7 letter trip code find? How long did that take?

 Narwhal!FABooStAsE 3151

File: 1339294159238.jpg (68.89 KB, 517x720)

>>3150
Like 2 days lol
I have 4 faboost ones now though

 Spoon (dd0c) 3152

File: 1339295388655.jpg (134 KB, 634x811)

>>3150 how do you get the identification tag thingy after your name in your post, you seem to be educated on the subject

 Anonymous (65de) 3153


 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3154

>>3152
Next to your name put a # key then a selection of random letters or numbers. This will then make it so I couldn't just put my name as spoon and copy who you are. It would look something like:

Spoon#T9sjNa2

That could show as something like:

Spoon !s8Qnxju1A


You can also use programs to search through trip codes to find one with a combination of letters in the code which you want. I used tripper+.

http://desktopthread.com/Tripcode_Explorer/

 Spoon (dd0c) 3155

File: 1339296411680.jpg (736.15 KB, 2554x3620)

>>3154
how long will it take to find a 9 letter one?

 Narwhal!ImFaBoosTI 3156

>>3155

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaages

 Spoon (dd0c) 3157

File: 1339296674087.jpg (54.75 KB, 454x600)

>>3156
Running a virtual machine on 2 computers to speed up the process muahaha

 Narwhal!FABooStAsE 3158

>>3157

I had to leave mine overnight

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3159

File: 1339297035401.jpg (1 MB, 3000x1997)

>>3157
What could you possible want with 9 let- OH MY GOD

You're faboostest :3

 Cheddar!IChedzmaqM 3160

Hang on guys, move the topic to the Chloe thread. This thread is for forced anon and shit.


Delete Post []
This site is for a more mature audience
That doesn’t mean you have to be over 18 to post here, it just means that some of the jokes and language here might not be suitable to a more prude or young crowd.
back to index
[ chloe ] [ photoshoots / photo sets / movies ] [ offtopic ] [ site ]